Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

Sounds good! Good to know that Fox was on it and not newly reported by the Wash. Post.

Must have missed the reference on Fox. They alone seem to be covering much of this. At least now it can not be covered up. Thanks TigersEye.


26 posted on 11/12/2012 10:46:58 PM PST by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Deagle
AFAIK WaPo has never said a thing about CBA and POTUS' sole authority to issue it. They didn't use the term CBA even on Pirro's show but they did express the principle. So far I don't think most of them have even thought of it. It hasn't occurred to them that only POTUS could give the order.

We need the press to start asking about that so that House Reps will start asking their witnesses about it. Once the concept takes hold publically there is no excuse and no spin that changes any of those three facts. Panetta is out there trying to create an excuse to get ahead of this but he's making a fool of himself.

On Benghazi, Panetta Says Needed 'Advance Notice' of Surprise Attack for Timely Response

27 posted on 11/12/2012 11:02:42 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson