Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

Agree with all that, but Sandy had no back side when it hit land. Was having trouble wrapping up its west end which was being stripped away and taken north by the cold front. Then when it sped up just before landfall, it could not pull anything from the west side at all. There was no moisture to speak of on its SE side when landing. My guess is when the cold low pressure joined up with Sandy, it pulled Sandy in and sped up its forward motion basically ripping the Hurricane/Tropical Storm apart. So the joining of the storms actually made Sandy less powerful, which was the opposite of what they predicted. Forecasters forgot that cold air is more dense then warm air.


35 posted on 10/30/2012 1:23:35 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: justa-hairyape

Having stated that, it was obvious that north and north east of landfall was going to experience record flooding. That was always a given, if it took the path that it took. Speeding up its forward motion, which was not predicted, actually lessened the severity of the flooding. IE - The storm had less time to apply its pressure and wind forces to water motion.


36 posted on 10/30/2012 1:27:53 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: justa-hairyape

That was dry air wrapping in. The cold front was still out in central PA.


37 posted on 10/30/2012 1:33:34 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson