Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama grabs wide lead among those who have already voted: Reuters/Ipsos poll
Reuters ^ | Oct. 14, 2012 | Andy Sullivan

Posted on 10/13/2012 10:51:11 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are neck and neck in opinion polls, but there is one area in which the incumbent appears to have a big advantage: those who have already cast their ballots.

Obama leads Romney by 59 percent to 31 percent among early voters, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling data compiled in recent weeks.

The sample size of early voters is relatively small, but the Democrat's margin is still well above the poll's credibility interval - a measurement of polls' accuracy - of 10 percentage points. (full graphic: bit.ly/RmeEen)

With the November 6 election just more than three weeks away, 7 percent of those surveyed said they had already voted either in person or by mail (full graphic: bit.ly/SWm5YR).

The online poll is another sign that early voting is likely to play a bigger role this year than in 2008, when roughly one in three voters cast a ballot before Election Day. Voting is already under way in some form in at least 40 states.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2012 10:51:23 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Early voting is a liberal conduit for fraud.


2 posted on 10/13/2012 10:52:36 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I think somebody been hittin’ da happy smoke. This is the weirdest “election” BS I’ve seen so far.


3 posted on 10/13/2012 10:55:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Obama "foam"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

George Gilder on Why Socialism Always Fails

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvWbjpcy9jI


4 posted on 10/13/2012 10:55:47 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The poll has a 90% credibility? That’s like a 5 or maybe 5.5 margin on error in normal circumstances. Not a healthy poll.


5 posted on 10/13/2012 10:56:20 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008BAL1OK/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Early voting is a liberal conduit for fraud.

Oh relax. Early voting is a Republican invention - a convenience issue for people who have to work on Tuesdays (unlike libs).

States that have early voting: Utah, Idaho, Nebraska, Kansas

States that do not have early voting: Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Michigan.

As for fraud, fraud potential is greatest on election day -- when hordes of people show up all at once at thousands of polling places. When somebody votes in advance there's time to check a voter for fraud.

6 posted on 10/13/2012 10:59:18 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The sample size of early voters is relatively small, but the Democrat's margin is still well above the poll's credibility interval - a measurement of polls' accuracy - of 10 percentage points.

I learned in Poly Sci 101 back in the day that any margin of error above 5% is worthless.

7 posted on 10/13/2012 11:00:53 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Holding my nose one more time to get rid of Eric Holder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

“Early voting is a Republican invention”

****

Was very common in the 1800s for the similar reasons that you gave. An agrarian society, farmers infrequently came to town. Common to be able to vote for up a month prior to election day for this reason. In other words, the producers didn’t have the luxury of the moochers to vote on just one day.


8 posted on 10/13/2012 11:02:25 PM PDT by peyton randolph (FUBO and his wookie beard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

These early vote numbers are starting to make me think we are watching this election being stolen before our very eyes.


9 posted on 10/13/2012 11:02:49 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

10% MOE? Sample size is too small.


10 posted on 10/13/2012 11:03:00 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Yep, just went and looked at the data. They only have 361 early voters in their survey. That means that each voter moves the needle a quarter of a point.

So they found that:

213 people surveyed said they voted early and for Obama.
112 people surveyed said they voted early and for Romney.
36 people surveyed said they voted early and for someone else.

Not this is data culled from their entire survey of 11,000 registered voters.

What does this mean? Jack squat. It’s not a big enough sample to be taken seriously.


11 posted on 10/13/2012 11:05:54 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008BAL1OK/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Progressivism-Communism-Liberalism-Marxism-Obamism ad nauseum are all on life support.

We are just waiting for the death rattle.

12 posted on 10/13/2012 11:08:27 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Is it even legal to report such things?

I thought the “exit polls” couldn’t be reported until all voting locations are closed.


13 posted on 10/13/2012 11:10:41 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: berdie

There is no law against reporting anything you find from a survey. Exit poll reporting is perfectly legal, but pretty dirty because it influences people.

On the other hand, if the official tallys are released by someone then it’s big prison time.


14 posted on 10/13/2012 11:12:45 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008BAL1OK/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Not quite. In the past, you were supposed to have an actual reason for absentee/early voting.


15 posted on 10/13/2012 11:18:16 PM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This headline is pure hyperbole even if true.

Obama has 59% of 7% of total voters, or 4.13% to Romney’s 31% of 7% or 2.17%. So the huge Obama lead is less than 2%.

If the results are true...


16 posted on 10/13/2012 11:22:30 PM PDT by lowteksh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

meaningless crap...

Our job is to get out the vote. Make sure O is defeated and elect as many conservatives to the house and senate as possible. OUR COUNTRY DEPENDS ON IT.


17 posted on 10/13/2012 11:23:55 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

So 10% of early voters voted for Gary Johnson, Roseanne, or some other candidate? They were motivated enough to vote early for one of those turkeys. This poll is statistical horsemanure (but it does grab headlines and will get counted in the Really Crappy Polls average).


18 posted on 10/13/2012 11:27:16 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

*213 people surveyed said they voted early and for Obama.
112 people surveyed said they voted early and for Romney.
36 people surveyed said they voted early and for someone else.*

61,000 are hidden in a trunk in Cleveland along with 130,000 dead Odungophones and 4 box lunches


19 posted on 10/13/2012 11:28:09 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Only land owners could vote! Moochers were not allowed course they usually died of starvation!


20 posted on 10/13/2012 11:29:57 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson