[Dead Corpse]

Wrong. The husband was trespassing with intent to at least confront the other man. The husband initiated the attack.

Game over.

[Uncle Chip]

The husband was trespassing with intent to at least confront the other man.

The Castle Doctrine does not exist so that you can kill someone who is confronting you verbally.

[DiogenesLamp]

Wrong. The husband was trespassing with intent to at least confront the other man. The husband initiated the attack.

Game over.

Maybe so, but does it occur to anyone that a man who is knowingly sleeping with another man's wife ought to get his a$$ beaten?

There was a time when the legal system enforced adultery laws. Unless I am mistaken, somewhere in the Bible it mentions that it is the duty of the rulers to punish murderers so that the family of the victims will not feel compelled to seek out justice themselves.

I would argue that the same logic ought to apply for adultery. Of course we are a long way from where we used to be as a nation.

The legal system; So full of technicalities and so void of justice.