Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Condor 63

If it was indexed back to the % of people who lived beyond the original retirement age from the 30s, it would now be about 75 or 76. And by the way, that would make the program solvent (assuming we get rid of Obama’s SSI give aways).


13 posted on 09/25/2012 5:20:13 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Opinionated Blowhard

I believe that is exactly right.

In it’s current incarnation, social security is a pure ponzi scheme. The idea is that you can put in a finite amount of cash and then pull out a much larger amount of cash — for decades. That just doesn’t work.

Originally, the idea was that most people would pay in, most people would die before the retirement age, most people would lose all the money that they paid in, and very, very few people would get payouts of any kind — and those lucky people would also most likely die before collecting for too many years.

Now, it’s all quite different, and the numbers are just not sustainable.

Again: Social Security was designed as a system in which most people would pay and get nothing. That was the plan

Guess what? We’re going back to that. The people (such as myself) who paid in, and who may feel that they are “owed” money, are most likely not going to get much of anything. It’s how it was meant to be.


21 posted on 09/25/2012 5:26:51 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson