Deadly Attack in Libya Was Major Blow to C.I.A. Efforts

The New York Times ^ | September 23, 2012 | ERIC SCHMITT, HELENE COOPER and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you - I knew I could find it if I looked but I’m crazy busy right now. I have to listen to that.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Ernest. That should please all the Lew Rockwell / Ron Paul fans.

[PieterCasparzen]

What two leftists made the movie? I figured it had to be made by leftists and the amdinistration’s lies about it made the connection obvious, along with all the other bogusness.

nwo meaing new world order, not a typo of two. I figured exactly the same as you did.

The facts are too hazy. Oh, and the little fact that there are hundreds of thousands of anti-islam videos on youtube going back over a decade. Just like there are tons of pro-islam videos on youtube.

The admin thinks more people believe their propaganda machine than actually do, IMHO.

One has to also remember that there are many younger muslims in the mideast who buy into the New Left/new world order intelligentsia-promoted idea that religion is like which sports team you like and that everyone will "get along" when they get suburbanized enough. These people can have a lot of interaction with the State department to make things look like peace with muslim countries is just around the corner.

IMHO, Hitlery's State department basically put people into Libya with big targets on their backs. I'm guessing that the evil wacko intelligentsia in the New Left who actually make the plans that the administration is tasked with got the message through to Hitlery confirming that the intelligence they had - a 9/11 attack on many embassies - was real, then they just would have to add a simple message that a youtube video would be the fake reason. That's a pretty short message, would not take much to transmit verbally through some subordinate's (hundreds of possibles, people like Huma) connections over lunch. The State Dept could then get most people out beforehand, so there were not thousands of Americans killed, leaving a few "heros" there to take the hit and feed the bloodthirsty mobs. The New Left's "Make America Impotent" program scores a win, and the administration has it's hands clean and the propaganda machine to feed Democrats the Kool-Aid. This could explain why Susan Rice was the one to come out with the story; Hitlery could pass her the talking points ahead of time through normal channels without raising the eyebrows that would be raised by giving them to the WH / Jay Carney. The WH does not want to know any details ahead of time, but Rice would have been ready to speak to the media as soon as the story broke. Before it really starts being pinned completely on the administration, she can call a press conference and put out here well-prepared video story. Rinse, repeat for 1 week, and most rubes in America will say "those people shouldn't have made that movie, that's what caused the attacks" and the news cycle is over for that one.

Nobama would not have to know or care anything about this beforehand. Hitlery could just "report" the talking points to him after it started. That's why Nobama smiles - his hands are kept perfectly clean by everyone around him. His role is just to foul up the Executive Branch as much as possible and restrain America from taking action against enemies.

I'm just guessing all this, of course.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you for your explanation. My eyes aren’t as good as they used to be and I read “nwo” as “two”.

I wonder if the supposed Egyptian Copt even had anything to do with the movie. I assume pressure was put on him one way or another. If there were enough real investigative journalists in the US, someone would be delving into this.