I’m going to give it an 8.8; that little hop step on the landing hurt your score. The East German judge liked it, though.
None of that stuff is going to help him get more votes than Barack Hussein Obama, which is the goal here, not ideology.
BTTT
Why should he show YOU his cards? The best way to deal with thugs like Obama and his media liars is to show the cards when it is to our greatest advantage, for example stumping the chump in a debate. He can best go after Obama if Obama doesn’t know what is coming and doesn’t have a handy teleprompter response.
I wonder what Mitt and advisor Stuart Steven are discussing right now about the best way to deal with obviously what will be an attempt by the WH and media in making his accurate statement into a controversy and TV ads with sick and disable people saying that they are not lazy and not dependent....etc. The only course of action now is to stick to his statement and rally conservatives and the base, anything else in apologizing or making concessions will doom him and make him look weak. But I fear that he will backtrack, hopefully I’m wrong
Mother Jones tapes? What are those?
David Corn? Who is he?
Goodness gracious; am I that far out of the loop? I have no idea what this is all about.
The Makers [53%] will vote for Romney.
The Takers [47%] will vote for Obama.
So what are YOU? A Maker or a Taker?
Vote Accordingly...
“You and your friends have so much cash on hand you could easily roll this Chicago thug up in a second.”
He won’t do it, is a wuss.
Amen brother, but I’m not expecting much from Romney in the way of conservative action.
Hearing Romney may speak tonight.
The mediaWHORES are pulling the same CHIT they did on Sarah!! FUDGE, are we going to let them decide this election???...THIS IS WAR people!
Well, I agree that he had better not try to apologize or weasel out of it. He said it, and he has to stick to it.
But, frankly, I listened to it, and I think he messed up. Even though this was supposed to be a closed meeting, he has to be more careful.
He SHOULD have said. that the reason there are so many people on the dole is that the Democrats PUT THEM THERE. Not everyone on the dole is there because they choose to be. A lot of people have lost their jobs in the past several years because Obama screwed up the economy.
Sure, some people are on the dole and like it. But even that is the result of Democrats putting them there, by breaking up their families over the past several generations, or by brainwashing them in the public school system.
In other words, don’t point the finger of blame at the people on the dole. Point it at the politicians who put them there. Much smarter, politically.
And those running Romney's campaign are simply, ignorant. And no points for Mitt; not 'getting it'.
Take a page from Allen West; and 'move on' through this. Take a page yet, from Clint. Best defense; a better offensive.
Sorry, Headache, but it won’t happen.
I’m a Massachusetts voter with Tea Party loyalties and I watched Mitt Romney lose a Senate bid against Ted Kennedy in 1994. And the biggest reason for the loss (besides running against the Blessed Liberal Lion in the bluest of blue states) is that Romney NEVER threw any of the abundant dirt he had available.
I was screaming the exact same thing — TAKE THE DAMN GLOVES OFF — but Mitt never did. Not once did he go negative on Teddy K, who had negatives by the ton to worry about, and that cost Mitt the election, IMHO.
Will he go negative now, with all the crap one could throw against Obummer?
Something tells me, no. Sorry and furious to say it, but no.