You’re being an idiot. He was shooting down the ‘Truther’ myth.
That's odd, as the article had nothing to do with that. Did you read it?
According to the article, the author only questioned why the U.S. government did not want to report the incident, why didn't the 9/11 Commission mention it in their official report, and why this incident was not mentioned until a decade later.
From what I read, this article had zip to do with Bush, the truthers, and never once implied or suggested the attacks were part of some government conspiracy. No?
In fact, if this is the case and the story is accurate, which might well be in this case, does it not seem a bit suspect it was not officially reported in some manner, way back when?