Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

not only that metmom- but htese scientists have to REJECT direct evidence that shows that evolution is a biological mathematical, chemical and time sensitive impossibility- and put all their faith in a process that simply defies logic- they have to wave their hands and state ‘well we don’t have to discuss the abiogenisis’ as though that isn’t a crucial step in their allegations that life began from chemicals? Dirty chemicals at that- Their ‘Will if this had happened, then this could have happened provided so and so was inplace first, and provided nature suppressed such and such’ is the epitome of hypocrisy when they then turn aroudn and claim Christians beleive in fairy tales because they beleive in an intelligent designer


257 posted on 09/10/2012 10:10:49 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

What’s a “dirty chemical?”


260 posted on 09/10/2012 10:28:42 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson