It was about guns and the question asked was whether I thought cops and civilians were treated equally. I merely stated then and again now that police are subject to stringent back round checks and intensive training before they are permitted to even join the force much less carry a weapon.
There was NO question regarding a specific statute anywhere.
Here's the actual text:
Since you brought it up, do you feel police should be subjected to the same gun laws as legitimate law abiding citizens?It was about guns and the question asked was whether I thought cops and civilians were treated equally. I merely stated then and again now that police are subject to stringent back round checks and intensive training before they are permitted to even join the force much less carry a weapon.
You said "gun laws" not "background checks."
Furthermore, I was the one listing statutes that treat cops and civilians [sic -- most police are civilians as they are not military] because that's what they would call, in court, evidence to support my case that the police and general-citizenry are not treated equally under the law WRT weapons.