[Lando Lincoln]

Okay, I get the math part. I get it. But, now a (plausible) hypothetical.

Florida
500 - "principled" conservatives vote for third candidate
400 - Obama's winning margin on election night

Math says?

[freedumb2003]

>>Okay, I get the math part. I get it. But, now a (plausible) hypothetical.
Florida
500 - “principled” conservatives vote for third candidate
400 - Obama’s winning margin on election night

Math says?<<

You will NOT get a straight answer. Instead you will get the same stupid sophistry I have been getting from the same old obama supporters on this and other threads.

Math is fuzzy in their universe I guess (actually it is just a temper tantrum since reality didn’t reflect their desired outcome).

[Finny]

Math says ... that 500 conservatives voted for a third party candidate and Romney lost because he didn't get enough votes. You insist on claiming that the third party votes "favored" Obama, yet one is left wondering if the independents and disillusioned Democrats and Green Party Pinheads who voted third party, also "favored" Obama? What if the winning margin went to Romney -- would those third party candidate votes still favor Obama, or would they favor Romney?

You, on the other hand, are saying that Romney lost because those 500 conservaitves "voted for Obama!" Which is a lie by way of distortion, as you know. But you must stick to that lie in order to demonize those of us who refuse to vote for government tyranny.

Face it. There's only ONE WAY for a Republican to vote for Obama, and that's to mark his name on the ballot. There's only ONE WAY for a Democrat or an Independent or a Green Wacko to vote for Romney, and that's to mark his name on the ballot.

LIkewise, there's only ONE WAY to vote for government tyranny, and that is to mark your ballot for a statist. That's what you plan to do, and that's what you are here urging others to do.

THAT IS THE MATH.