Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[homosexual] University doctor who sexually molested patients sued for wrongful death
Mail Online ^ | July 2, 2012 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 07/07/2012 3:20:56 PM PDT by kevcol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
homosexual molesting doctor:


...no longer screening 20-something male students with his ***** for colon cancer
1 posted on 07/07/2012 3:21:11 PM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Dead people are more likely to win when they sue for wrongful death...
:)


2 posted on 07/07/2012 3:24:12 PM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Creepy...ick!


3 posted on 07/07/2012 3:29:52 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

The article does not exlicitly declare that this white doctor accused of sexually molesting a black man (boy?) is a homosexual.

Why?


4 posted on 07/07/2012 3:40:49 PM PDT by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Stafford was 23, not 13. Old enough to know better.


5 posted on 07/07/2012 3:44:51 PM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Stafford was 23, not 13. Old enough to know better.


6 posted on 07/07/2012 3:44:59 PM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

Because it goes without saying? If I correctly understood the article before my security monitor shut it down, the student was 21 when he sought treatment from the doctor for an STD.

At what point could we say a 21-year-old man who’s obviously sexually active ought to be able to tell a 50-year-old queen to buzz off? We either need to say all homosexual activity is intolerable, period, or allow that a consensual relationship is the responsibility of the parties involved.


7 posted on 07/07/2012 3:48:01 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("If I want someone without merit, I'll simply vote for the Moslem ferret!" ~Da Coyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
"But Kevess' attorney, Robert Beles, denied the allegations. 'Any of the alleged conduct against Dr. Kevess in relation to this young man in no way proximately caused any of his psychological problems or in any way caused his death,'"

The charges and this attorney's denial make me think there could be a lot of unintended consequences from the Ravi/Clementi case at Rutgers. If Ravi can be held criminally liable for his actions that led to the suicide death of a homosexual, I suspect the reverse case can be made just as easily...that unwanted homo advances that drive somebody to suicide can be criminally prosecuted.

8 posted on 07/07/2012 3:50:09 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Naahhh! Couldn’t be. Registered Democrats never do anything wrong.


9 posted on 07/07/2012 3:50:41 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

This is sad, but, dude was 23 years old. Why didn’t he get up off the table and knock the crap out of the pervert doctor? Something is fishy here. It’s not like it was an innocent 9 year old child.


10 posted on 07/07/2012 3:54:26 PM PDT by no dems (On June 28th, they shoved ObamaCare down our throat. On Nov. 6th, we'll shove it up their ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
'Any of the alleged conduct against Dr. Kevess in relation to this young man in no way proximately caused any of his psychological problems

Unlike most doctors, this one tried spread his disease rather than try to cure himself.

That poor kid. Imagine his horror. That so-called doctor should get the death penalty if found guilty. How many other lives has he destroyed with his filth?

Our founding fathers gave people like this the death penalty for good reason. They knew what they were. Letting them out of the insane asylums was one of the worst mistakes this country has ever made. These people are not "normal."

11 posted on 07/07/2012 3:57:33 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

At the least, the Doc should lose his license for gross abuse of the Dr. - patient relationship. The article says the homo Doc subjected the patient to BS procedures. A SWAG would be that it brought forth latent or suppressed homosexual tendencies for which the kid felt guilty.


12 posted on 07/07/2012 4:03:44 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
Stafford was 23, not 13. Old enough to know better

2 things: (1) This University Doctor (on staff there for 23 years) was in a position of authority over the student in some sense. He could have used any number of threats to keep the student quiet. Doctor could have told the student he was 'gay' and to stop resisting it. (2) Not all 23 yr olds have the same maturity level. He could have been a smart but immature guy who had no idea/experience/education of how to handle the situation.

Most of the above is just conjecture as to how a 23 yr old student could have been manipulated by this doctor.
13 posted on 07/07/2012 4:09:50 PM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Note to self: no prostate exams from Robert Kevess


14 posted on 07/07/2012 4:18:17 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
A former UC Berkeley doctor accused of sexually molesting six male patients

This wouldn't be that hard if he got them hooked on some kind of prescription drug. They'd have to come back again and again - against their will - sort of.

Six guys are a lot of victims.

15 posted on 07/07/2012 4:18:17 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

San Fransicko area is indeed sick.. in so many ways..
Who can count them all.. the only crime here is the cowardice of the 23 year old..


16 posted on 07/07/2012 4:32:47 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
the only crime here is the cowardice of the 23 year old..

What about his other 5 victims?

17 posted on 07/07/2012 4:40:08 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

There is an epidemic of this crap. In Illinois, active, overt male homosexuals are permitted to adopt and foster male children. Anyone who refuses to cooperate with this outrage is severed from the state foster care program. Foster care in Illinois has become a vehicle for child abuse. All because the homosexual organizations have become an arm of an increasingly depraved, decadent Democrat party.
The media of course are accomplices: in Chicago the major media outlets enter floats in the homosexual “pride” parade.
18 posted on 07/07/2012 4:43:16 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

I think forcible rape should be a death penalty offense, but I am no fan of sticking people with murder charges when somebody commits suicide.

Totally unproveable and subject to abuse. Even if the dead person blames them in a suicide note before they do it, the fact is the dead person could have chosen not to do it.

I’d never vote for a conviction on this.


19 posted on 07/07/2012 5:03:23 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

The victimization wars are being waged here: gays v. blacks. In the media, the gays win, no questions asked.


20 posted on 07/07/2012 5:05:35 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson