B. In the debates, Romney clearly distanced himself from whatever he may have said in Massachuseetts, formerly. The effort I propose would continue to push him in the positive (i.e., in favor of traditional morality) values.
C. How Romney views "polygamy" is not a contemporary American issue, accept among Mormon bashers. Since Mormons tend to be Conservative, I am very unsympathetic to Mormon bashers.
If you are so concerned with denouncing polygamy, do you propose taking "Proverbs" out of the Bible--or reject it because of Solomon's marital behavior? This is all a non-issue, being injected into the campaign to divide us.
Why the antagonism to someone who is definitely moving in our direction? Might he back-track? Not if we do our job right. That is the whole point.
Truth is not divisible. The same principles that apply to business conditions that Romney understands and knows ow to deal with, are equally applicable to all other socio/economic conditions. What is essential is that we better hone our ability to make those points clear.
William Flax
“How Romney views ‘polygamy’ is not a contemporary American issue, accept among Mormon bashers.”
Whether you accept or reject Mormon bashers, how can anyone trust a man who is afraid to tell the truth? You speak about manipulating a President of the United States like it is akin to repositioning your favorite chair in the living room. Why would I want to place a jellyfish in a position of leadership?
Are you really that crippled by fear of the alternatives?