No Birth Certificate Required

The Washington Free Beacon ^ | May 8, 2012 | Staff

[CitizenM]

- Pro-Choice White House Requires Registration of Unborn Children for Tours - The White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

White House Visitors Office director Ellie Schafer sent an email to a Capitol Hill staffer Tuesday morning explaining the process for registering an unborn fetus for a White House tour:

We have received a number of calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet been born.

Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process.

LAST NAME: The family’s last name

FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name
MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name
DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we’ll ask you to update it at the time of birth
SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero’s (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!)
CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parents

Update: The National Right to Life Committee released a statement on Tuesday afternoon about Shafer’s email, highlighting the fact that the “Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes, but tolerates legal abortion to [the] moment 
of birth in District of Columbia.”

[CitizenM]

The hypocrisy of the confused, self-serving Liberal mind. Now they declare that an unborn baby is a life and human entity when they want to "count" it. But if they want to abort it...well, then that's alright because it is only a collection of cells and not really a human anyway.

And...What happens if the mother aborts the baby after she has visited the White House and the child was recorded as a "visitor?" Do they go back and ask that the record of that baby be deleted, since, obviously, the pro-abortion belief is that human baby never existed?

How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?

[Anti-Hillary]

The dumb get dumber and, well, the folks at FR just scratch their collective heads... This counrty is bassackwards for sure! And to think that liberals are usually creatures of “higher learning”...

[Brown Deer]

The National Right to Life Committee released a statement on Tuesday afternoon about Shafer’s email, highlighting the fact that the “Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes, but tolerates legal abortion to [the] moment 
of birth in District of Columbia.”

"It is ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House -- yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth,” said Douglas Johnson, National Right to Life legislative director. “Notably, the newsletter provides no guidance on what the staff should do if an unborn baby is first registered for security purposes, but then aborted. On May 17, the House Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee plans to hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would generally prohibit abortion in the sixth month and later in the District. If the President wants to provide for the security of the unborn child immediately outside of the White House gates, as well as inside, he should endorse this bill."

[justrepublican]

Birthers.

[sthguard]

Maybe they’ll compromise and count pre-born babies as three-fifths of a person.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

C’est plus ca change, C’est plus sa meme change!

{”the more things change, the more they stay the same!”}

[philman_36]

Perfectly representative of the current administration...

We are the sole arbiters of what does and doesn't count.

[NKP_Vet]

Just means democrats have no problem at all with MURDER. They could care less if there’s living, breathing human being residing in the body of the murder. They thinks it’s the “right” of the mother to murder this child, time and time again, if she feels like it.

[Biggirl]

Yet this is the same Obama White House that would struggle to explain why a legit BC cannot be produced from Obama.

[donna]

Is this a joke? Why would anyone register an unborn baby?

[Elsiejay]

“Just means democrats have no problem at all with MURDER . .”

There once was, and may yet be a Democrats For Life organization, and I believe some members of the Congress were members. However, I don’t know of anything its members did to make Dems For Life well and openly known to the public.

[plain talk]

This is incredibly stupid on many levels. Count the unborn however they wish but how about we just don’t kill them?

[PghBaldy]

I want to know too. Why would OBAMA want this? For what purpose is this maniacal pro-infanticide creature doing this?

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Just to screw with everyone. An ‘in your face’ action. A big F-You to the people who believe life begins at conception.

[Menehune56]

Totally agree!

[Delta 21]

But what if the mother is planning on getting an abortion?

[Noob1999]

................How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?...................

Maybe it’s easy. If the mother-to-be checks off Democrat, her future vote will be counted as two votes, as they both visited the White Hut!

[donna]

I thought it was an evil Marxist joke, but, I found this:

Requiring parents to register their unborn child “serves as a placeholder,” spokesman Max Milien said. He said the policy helps “to expedite the process” when parents arrive for a tour with a baby who has been born recently.

[Ellendra]

Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes,

What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?

[OneWingedShark]

>
What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?

Don’t you get it, any human poses a security risk simply because they have that “free will” thing!