Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann to Endorse Romney
National Review ^ | Wednesday May 2, 2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 05/02/2012 2:24:25 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

National Review Online has confirmed that Michele Bachmann will endorse Mitt Romney tomorrow at a campaign event in Virginia.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2012endorsements; 2012swingstates; 58fosterkids; bachmann; bachmann4romney; backstabbing; election2012; endorsements; imataxattorney; kenyanbornmuzzie; michelebachmann; minnesota; mittromney; romney; stalkinghorse; va2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-547 next last
To: A.Hun

I will call her what I dame well please! She earned it.

What you see as intelligence has nothing to do with willing and easy prey to be bought off and a sell out - she probably thought it was an intelligent move for her politically. This is my country but she used it for her political ladder. Wisdom knows what you sow you reap and wisdom knows it comes LATER than you sow and MORE than you sow. So much for intelligence.

I don’t need to hear from you again. I have no time for the clueless and deceived. It’s six months trying to teach what now is confirmed as UNTEACHABLE. Get lost - mitt could only be where he is with voters like you.


101 posted on 05/02/2012 6:52:58 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Neither. That’s what is known as a false dilemma.

Let me repeat: I don’t support pro-choice democrats.


102 posted on 05/02/2012 6:55:54 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Its just plain low to use that word to describe her because she endorsed Romney.

Your hatred for Romney is not only pathological, but pathetic. I had nothing to do with Romney getting the nomination and neither did she.

You’re even selling out your country because of it.

If there wasn’t so much at stake, I wouldn’t even bother calling a wretch like you on it.


103 posted on 05/02/2012 7:02:53 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
It's not the smugness of driving a Prius. It's the smugness of a construction worker leaving out rivets in a bridge to get back at his boss....sacrificing everyone else's safety on the bridge.

Perfect.

104 posted on 05/02/2012 7:04:30 PM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Romney is neither pro choice or a Democrat. He’s always been a Republican and he renounced his pro choice position.

Will Obama ever do that?

Straw men is all you have.

Want to try again?


105 posted on 05/02/2012 7:05:35 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

To: A.Hun
"Mitt Romney is still a pro-choice democrat, and admits it on his own website"
107 posted on 05/02/2012 7:09:28 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All

Hey all, just got up from a nap, did I miss anything? Last I heard Newt dropped out and is supporting Mitt....


108 posted on 05/02/2012 7:10:45 PM PDT by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; EternalVigilance
the same that this nation has faced every four years since its inception.

WRONG!! This was a slam dunk easiest election - there was ONLY TWO candidate with credentials to be president to even consider and Perry dropped out! No Conservative wanted mitt. NEWT was the clear choice. EASY, VERY EASY! And another slam dunk is he is the ONLY ONE who could beat Obama.

Every other year we compared all the candidates on each subject weakness/strength. And every other year - we didn't have a LIBERAL who HAD to stack the debates for his needed protection. Mitt has been working on this for before '08!

Conservatives WILL get someone to run that they can vote for - so take your hopes off of Christians, Conservatives and Patriots to vote for your pro homo baby killing socialistic style healthcare candidate. It's not going to happen - you need liberal votes and you are on the WRONG site for that. This is not your audience so get lost.

109 posted on 05/02/2012 7:13:04 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Fascinating. So, Newt endorses Romney BEFORE Michelle does, and you blame her for what Newt does? That’s assinine.

Newt spent himself into a fiscal oblivion that Michelle and the others chose not to. Does that speak well of Newt as a conservative?

Michelle is a great Christian woman with an excellent Christian husband.

We all would do well to follow their examples.


110 posted on 05/02/2012 7:13:33 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Well, that’s too bad.


111 posted on 05/02/2012 7:14:44 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

I wouldn’t.

Because she lost a political primary and then endorses the winner, she’s a whore? Will you use the same insult on Palin if she endorses Mitt?

You people are sick.


112 posted on 05/02/2012 7:16:55 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

“Romney is neither pro choice or a Democrat. He’s always been a Republican and he renounced his pro choice position.”

Yeah...that was this week...ha ha.

When will he renounce his love for socialized medicine?

When will he renounce his love for tyrannical government mandates?

When will he renounce his support for cap & trade?

When will he renounce his endorsement of the assault weapons ban?

When will he renounce $50 Romneycare abortions?

When will he renounce his support for a “progressive tax system”.?

When will he renounce his class warfare tax plan defining the “rich” at $200k...$50k less than Zero?

When will he renounce his support of the claims of “man made global warming”?

When will he renounce forcing Catholic hospitals to provide contraception and abortions on demand?

When will he renounce his support for liberal judges?

When will he renounce his claim of being a “severe conservative” and slink back under a rock with the rest of the socialist sleaze?

Let me know when that happens.


113 posted on 05/02/2012 7:17:12 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

LOL!


114 posted on 05/02/2012 7:18:45 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #115 Removed by Moderator

To: presently no screen name
EASY, VERY EASY! And another slam dunk is he is the ONLY ONE who could beat Obama.

I actually agree with you about Newt...I voted for him and helped give him one of two states he carried!

It doesn't matter one bit though....he couldn't get enough others to vote for him. Perry? He was my first pick! But he dropped...that why I voted for Gingrich. BTW, there was an entire chorus of "conservative" Freepers that did everything in their power to force him out. Gardasil, illegal lover, Trans Texas Corridor, blah, blah, blah.

None of that matters now. Its done...Romney won. We are stuck with him.

It is him or Obama! There is no "do over", no mulligan.

Face the fact. Try reality for a change. This is politics. If Mitt doesn't deliver, try to unseat him in 2016...but for our nation's sake, GET RID OF OBAMA!

116 posted on 05/02/2012 7:25:17 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Your words are vile. If she is “Mitt’s whore,” your head needs to be examined. Otherwise, she, as well as Newt, are “Mitt’s whores,” with Newt jumping in first to get him some of that bailout pie from Daddy Romney.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!


117 posted on 05/02/2012 7:27:42 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Your words are vile. If she is “Mitt’s whore,” your head needs to be examined. Otherwise, she, as well as Newt, are “Mitt’s whores,” with Newt jumping in first to get him some of that bailout pie from Daddy Romney.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!


118 posted on 05/02/2012 7:27:47 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

“Because she lost a political primary and then endorses the winner, she’s a whore? Will you use the same insult on Palin if she endorses Mitt?”

Never put your faith in the man ( or woman in this case). They will ALWAYS disappoint you. Put your faith in their ideas..but never in the man.

So yes...her stock would drop significantly.

It’s like Gore and the global warming garbage. We know he doesn’t really believe it or care ( if he does believe it). We know this based upon his actions and his house, jet, etc. We know that Gore just carries on with the GW stuff because it keeps him politically relevant and he can generate support and money from certain constituencies.

Those who act principled and fold so quickly to rally around a candidate who was the unapologetic architect of socialized healthcare are frauds just like Al Gore.


119 posted on 05/02/2012 7:29:41 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

If everything you say is true, he is still a better choice than Obama.

Period.

If you want the greater of two evils to prevail, knock yourself out.


120 posted on 05/02/2012 7:29:41 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-547 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson