I'm not disputing you, he may have been an editor, but that's not the same as being the editor. Please take a look at this new FReeper thread, and follow the link to Breitbart. There is a book there that speaks of him as "president" of the law review. I believe his promotion at the Harvard Law Review was to a ceremonial post, and done for liberal-progressive reasons. However, even THEY were not stupid enough to actually make him editor-in-chief!! (And look at how far we've all climbed up the stupid-ladder since then; we made him president of the country.)
his name was included in the list of editors
.