To: Clintonfatigued
How is it set in stone that an 0bama defeat would bring a more conservative supreme court appointment?
After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this?
7 posted on
04/29/2012 6:48:05 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: EGPWS; EternalVigilance
Romney’s nomination isn’t set in stone. What is set in stone is what kind of judges Obama would appoint.
9 posted on
04/29/2012 6:50:37 AM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
To: EGPWS
We know what Obama will do....I would rather take a chance with Romney
10 posted on
04/29/2012 7:06:54 AM PDT by
southphilly
(Every State should be a right to work State)
To: EGPWS
After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this? All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.
To: EGPWS
After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this? There isn't any.
75 posted on
04/30/2012 9:13:01 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson