“was it smart of Mr Z to ignore the dispatcher and
contiinue to follow young Master M? No.
But disobeying a dispatcher is not evidence of a crime.”
There had been a number of break-ins in the neighborhood by young, Black men and he was concerned that Trayvon might be another burglar. He didn’t disobey the 911 operator. They have no power to compel anyone to do anything. The Sanford PD said it was a suggestion with no legal force of a command.
“Was it murder? No one can say. No witness saw
a murder, nor has video has surfaced till now showing
a murder.”
Actually, there are about six witnesses who all corroborate what they saw happen to Mr. Zimmerman and it lines up with his statements given to police.
“I don’t see how this goes anywhere except maybe an action
for ‘conspiracy to deprive him of his civil rights’, a federal beef.”
Deprive his civil rights in what way?
“bottom line is that there is no evidence of a crime here,
unless you count Martin’s attack on Z.”
And if Martin was bashing Zimmerman’s head against the concrete which could have resulted in death do you think that Zimmerman had a right to defend his life with lethal force?
“Deprive his civil rights in what way?”
Whatever way Eric Holder and his minions might construct.
In case you haven’t noticed, this is now a “political crime”.
Why do you think the Feds are looking at it? That is the only conceivable Fed charge that could possibly be laid.
“And if Martin was bashing Zimmerman’s head against the concrete which could have resulted in death do you think that Zimmerman had a right to defend his life with lethal force?”
Assuming that this is not a rhetorical question, of course he does.