[txrangerette]

Exactly.

Rush has said he won’t endorse, because he has to be careful to preserve his ability to support the ulitmate nominee.

Levin has been the most openly critical of Romney, but has already said he will vote for him if need be to rid us of Obama.

But sweep away their self serving statements and get down to the bottom line...

They are stretching and twisting themselves into corkscrews over helping some candidates and not others. Ignoring bad things about certain ones and magnifying things about others out of all proportion.

And in the end, they and the WSJ who has been for Romney but is now open to Santorum, agree on which candidates are underserving of support or defense.

And those candidates are the most qualified ones to lead a nation in these times.

And those candidates are not lawyers.

[CutePuppy]

They are stretching and twisting themselves into corkscrews over helping some candidates and not others. Ignoring bad things about certain ones and magnifying things about others out of all proportion. And in the end, they and the WSJ who has been for Romney but is now open to Santorum, agree on which candidates are undeserving of support or defense.

I usually think of pretzels in this context, instead of corkscrews, but that's exactly right and has been pretty transparent since SC - FL time frame.