Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing



"Barton says given the fact that Hindus are a tiny constituency of the American public, he questions the motivation of Senate leaders. "This is not a religion that has produced great things in the world," he observes. "

Read more: http://www.indiancinemafans.com/board/upload/lounge-57/historian-barton-says-hindu-prayer-before-senate-raises-concerns-13302/#ixzz1mE7yOTTl

"Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."
-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom
http://www.history1700s.com/etext/html/texts/jefferson/jeff1.txt
 
He "questions".  Uhuh.

FAIL.  No history soup for you!  Or for the Texas Board of Edumacation.


Got Morals and Dogma?

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=Morals+and+Dogma
 
 
 

26 posted on 02/12/2012 7:26:46 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LomanBill

Maybe you would be more comfortable with Freud?


29 posted on 02/12/2012 10:55:05 PM PST by itsahoot (I will Vote for Palin, even if I have to write her in.(Recycled Tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: LomanBill

============he questions the motivation of Senate leaders=============

and

============in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination===============

Non sequitor.

————————while Barton acknowledges there is not constitutional problem with a Hindu prayer in the Senate, he wonders about the political side of it. “One definitely wonders about the pragmatic side of it,” he says. “What is the message, and why is the message needed? And will it actually communicate anything other than engender with folks like me a lot of questions?”

Barton says he knows of at least seven cases where Christians have lost their bid to express their own faith in a public prayer.-———————

It’s a fair thing to wonder about. I’ve wondered about it myself, and Freepers wonder about it nearly daily, it seems.

============while Barton acknowledges there is not constitutional problem with a Hindu prayer in the Senate==========

=============while Barton acknowledges there is not constitutional problem with a Hindu prayer in the Senate============

========while Barton acknowledges there is not constitutional problem with a Hindu prayer in the Senate==========

And there it is. That right there is what you are looking for.


30 posted on 02/13/2012 3:27:09 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson