Posted on 01/11/2012 7:53:41 PM PST by Bigtigermike
(CNN) – John Bolton, the former U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations, is set to endorse presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a source close to Romney’s presidential campaign said Wednesday.
Bolton served in the administrations of former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush before former President George W. Bush appointed him the U.N. role.
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
Maybe I’m just off today and can’t remember a well known fact: what evidence is there that Romney and/or Bolton support gay “marriage”?
Thanks in advance.
I pinged out at least 2 articles last year when Bolton made his position on fag marriage and fags in the military clear. He’s for them both. Google and you’ll see. I don’t have the time to search through what I’ve pinged out or the homosexual agenda articles (those were some of the keywords) but he definitely is pro-homo marriage and pro-homos in the military. Not even the slightest doubt about it; many people were quite surprised and not happy about his comments in that regard.
If you don’t know that Romney supports homo marriage, you need to get out more. What do you think he did when he was Governmor of Mass? You haven’t read all the stuff about his very vocal and public support of “gay rights” at the time?
FYI.
Reiterating a point he made to the Daily Caller, Bolton confirms he’s willing to rankle some social conservatives by positioning himself to the Left of [Alleged] President Obama by explicitly voicing support for gay marriage. “I think [same-sex marriage] is something that in society today, we ought to be able to live with,” he says.
Thank you very much! Will save those.
Clintonfatigued, check out these three posts/links EternalVigilance posted. Very good damning info on Romney. Just in case anyone needs their face rubbed in it!
;-D
Placemark for Romneyfacts.
You are right, economy/money is almost always the overriding issue in every election.
Romney is the establishment candidate, so don’t be too shocked when the establishment supports him.
The Tea Party demographics is mainly upper income suburbans, mainly women. They will all hop on board the Romney Express.
Google “mitt romney” and number 3 that comes up is “Mitt Romney dog on car roof”
This is going to get really ugly!
That IMO is what we should strive for.
A neutered Obama with a GOP Senate and House is looking preferable to Romney-Obama-lite, with his Mormon belief system that he is becoming God. Anyone who would put a dog on the roof of his car for a trip cannot be trusted.
The lesser of two evils is an option I’m not sure I’m going to fall for this time around.
That's okay by me. But I'd prefer it to be less formalized, just make it easier/more streamlined to contract property rights and so on. I'm no legal expert but I can't think of any right that you couldn't contract for.
At least not any right they should have, we certainly don't need to be paying for spousal or survivor benefits to the partners of gay public employees.
But if it's a civil union with all the privileges of marriage, available only to gay lovers.....well I said the other day that semantics does matter but...."marriage"...just a word, "civil union", 2 words.
That's why I don't understand why they aren't happy with "civil unions" and demand "marriage". 2 men can't "marry" each other anymore than a teenage boy can marry his dad's Playboy collection.
But if what the gay lobby is after is the destruction of the institution of marriage
I forget where I heard this but some prominent gay activist IIRC said he'd prefer to just abolish marriage. He may have used the term "heteronormative" but as long as it exists gays should have it too. I get the sense that they don't all agree.
I know who wants it the most, divorce lawyers. Cha-ching.
People understand money more than anything else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.