Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper

I agree, I have no candidate in this race. That’s why I’m anxious to start a new party.


20 posted on 01/10/2012 10:57:47 PM PST by upsdriver (We Tea Partiers need Sarah Palin for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: upsdriver

If the Tea Party groups wanted to be relevant, the Tea Party groups should have endorsed a candidate before Iowa. Sitting on the sidelines shows complacency, cowardice, acquiescence and weakness. The establishment didn’t wait to endorse their candidate of choice. Why is the Tea Party surrendering like this? I’m very unimpressed with their timidity.


35 posted on 01/10/2012 11:08:08 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: upsdriver

IMHO Palin showed a lot of smarts by staying out of the race because destiny will consign the winner (Romney) to a slow death in the tarpit of American economic morass caused by ruinous central bankster debt.


38 posted on 01/10/2012 11:09:01 PM PST by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: upsdriver

I didn’t have a candidate either since Sarah raised the bar to where it should be. But Newt knows our country like no one else and one doesn’t burn the midnight oil on something they are just interested in but loves. And he can deliver a message the best of all - he’s gifted in that area, IMO. Then he has a proven track record of knowing how to get things done in DC. Then dealing with other nation leaders, Newt’s the guy for the job, no doubt about it.


59 posted on 01/10/2012 11:30:04 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson