Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich answers Rush Limbaugh
The Hill ^ | 1/10/2012 | Christian Heinze

Posted on 01/10/2012 1:23:20 PM PST by americanophile

On Fox & Friends this morning, Newt Gingrich fought back against Rush Limbaugh's criticism of his rhetoric on Bain Capital.

FOX HOST STEVE DOOCY: I was driving around yesterday in my car, and I was listening to Rush Limbaugh, and he was talking about you and how you're going after Mitt Romney and Bain Capital.

And he said that you're using the language of the Left to beat up on Romney over Bain.

He said it makes him uncomfortable because that's what the Left will do if Romney is the nominee.

GINGRICH: Well, I don't think I'm using the language of the Left. I'm using the language of classic American populism.

Main Street has always been suspicious of Wall Street, small businesses have always worried about big businesses.... and I think people have a natural concern when they see financiers come in from out of town, take over a company, take all the profits, and then leave people who are unemployed behind.

(Excerpt) Read more at gop12.thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: capitalism; gingrich; limbaugh; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-322 next last
To: TankerKC
Define "profit".

Simplistically it is revenues exceeding costs.

In general conversation costs are all expenses, aka overhead.

Now if you want to get into accounting semantics for the cumbersome tax reasons that is a different story.

181 posted on 01/10/2012 3:26:48 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

“So Romney rescued companies in trouble.”

NO, he did NOT. He killed them. Isn’t anyone on this thread paying attention?


182 posted on 01/10/2012 3:27:40 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: david1313
Business should share there profits with the workers. This is not capitalism. Wow what a concept. My business shares profits with the workers. Kinda the american way I think.

What percentage of profits should a business share with workers? I'm just curious what the treshold is.

For a private company, those profits are the money they use to re-invest and expand the company. For a publicly traded company, those profits are the money they use to re-invest and expand the company and the money they use to repay their investors risk.

Should it be 10%, 50%, 100% to the workers?

Or should it be up to the company?

Profit sharing is great, my company does it, but it is completely dependent on company performance and expansion goals - which is the way it should be in my humble opinion.

183 posted on 01/10/2012 3:30:42 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
"NO, he did NOT. He killed them. Isn’t anyone on this thread paying attention?"

WSJ says 22% failed %8 were mined so that means 70% succeeded.

184 posted on 01/10/2012 3:31:00 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: david1313
Business should share there profits with the workers. This is not capitalism. Wow what a concept. My business shares profits with the workers. Kinda the american way I think.

What percentage of profits should a business share with workers? I'm just curious what the treshold is.

For a private company, those profits are the money they use to re-invest and expand the company. For a publicly traded company, those profits are the money they use to re-invest and expand the company and the money they use to repay their investors risk.

Should it be 10%, 50%, 100% to the workers?

Or should it be up to the company?

Profit sharing is great, my company does it, but it is completely dependent on company performance and expansion goals - which is the way it should be in my humble opinion.

185 posted on 01/10/2012 3:32:27 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

So you’re saying Bain’s goal was to kill companies and kill jobs? Something is wrong with this whole line of thinking.


186 posted on 01/10/2012 3:33:27 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: onyx

ALL of these candidates need to do some in depth research. What ROMNEY did was not done by Bain Capital. It was done by mitt romney and a handpicked crew. It was done knowingly and with malice. Period. Newt is tight about this. But he needs to be specific about how it was done.


187 posted on 01/10/2012 3:33:44 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Well said. And I agree.

Didn’t have a chance to listen to Rush today..I’ll have to read the article and see what the hubbub is all about..


188 posted on 01/10/2012 3:35:20 PM PST by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Ditto what you posted, Onyx.

The caller at the end of the show comported himself well, made cogent points, wasn't cowed at all, and had Rush flummoxed and searching for words a couple of times.

This was notable because the few callers who take on the task of debating Rush always are at a disadvantage because they don't have a magic golden microphone at their disposal.......the host is always in the catbird seat.

(I was pulling for the caller, by the way, LOL)

Leni

189 posted on 01/10/2012 3:36:23 PM PST by MinuteGal (A Happy New Year is OBAMAGEDDON in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Simplistically it is revenues exceeding costs.

Do you consider payroll a cost?

190 posted on 01/10/2012 3:36:23 PM PST by TankerKC (Welcome to the age of "I Meant to Do That" Diplomacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Good post, I concur.

Cain brought Godfather’s back to “profitability” by SHRINKING the business and firing a quarter of the work force. As a result, Cain made a handsome profit, and those people never got their jobs back, Godfather’s never grew bigger so as to hire more people — not while Cain was in charge.

Maybe it didn't grow, but it sustained its self keeping many in employment.

Gotta take the good with the bad sometimes.

Cain saved more jobs that bammie!! lol!

191 posted on 01/10/2012 3:36:46 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: jpsb; MestaMachine
"WSJ says 22% failed %8 were mined so that means 70% succeeded."

You might want to re-read that....

"Ten deals produced more than 70% of the dollar gains.

Some of those companies, too, later ran into trouble. Of the 10 businesses on which Bain investors scored their biggest gains, four later landed in bankruptcy court."

192 posted on 01/10/2012 3:39:14 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Oh for G-d’s sake! Are you blind? I have said it at least 5 times now. It was NOT Bain Capital. It was romney who ran his own outfit at the time, all brand new and called it Bain VENTURE Capital. Nothing he did was previously Bain’s MO. NOTHING. HIS operation start to finish.
You wanna keep defending mitt romney? Go right ahead and make a fool of yourself. But the truth is coming out. Why are you defending him anyway?


193 posted on 01/10/2012 3:40:19 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Sarah Palin is loath to support Romney. Todd endorsement of Gingrich is likely the closest we will get, because I think her Faux Contract likely prohibits her from endorsing, given that she’s paid for her political analysis.

I don’t know how to trace and prove this close-knit group of Romney’s “croniy capitalist’s” do you?

The film maker used to be a Romney campaign insider, so his information is accurate.


194 posted on 01/10/2012 3:41:28 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: jpsb; MestaMachine; onyx
From the same WSJ article: Another finding was that Bain produced stellar returns for its investors—yet the bulk of these came from just a small number of its investments. Ten deals produced more than 70% of the dollar gains.

Some of those companies, too, later ran into trouble. Of the 10 businesses on which Bain investors scored their biggest gains, four later landed in bankruptcy court.

The Wall Street Journal examined 77 businesses and out of 10 "successes", four of those failed.

195 posted on 01/10/2012 3:41:28 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
At least we kept Romney from being nominated in 2008, let us pray that we can do the same this time. Was that a good thing? I soured on Romney in 2008 mainly because of negative attacks on other candidates during the debates. But back then, and even now with 4 years to think about it, was McCain a better choice than Romney?
196 posted on 01/10/2012 3:43:39 PM PST by joe212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

still a 60% success rate, is that bad? I am not an expert in this kind of stuff. but i would think saving 60% is pretty good.


197 posted on 01/10/2012 3:44:09 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
In a race with 4 solid conservatives,

Please tell me who the 4 solid conservatives remaining in the race?

A. Santorum
B. Gingrich
C. Perry
D. ?

Paul? Not a chance.

Romney? The picture perfect poster boy of RINOism.

Huntsman? Don't waste my time.

To whom are you referring?

TS

198 posted on 01/10/2012 3:44:22 PM PST by The Shrew (www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew

3 left Paul, Santorum and Perry


199 posted on 01/10/2012 3:46:27 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; onyx

CNN had an article that called what he did “leveraged buyouts, a cousin of hostile takeovers”.


200 posted on 01/10/2012 3:46:34 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson