Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iowa results: Santorum's baggage
Tribune Review (Pittsburgh area) ^ | 5 January 2012 | Tribune Editorial

Posted on 01/05/2012 6:40:43 AM PST by Vigilanteman

Just how unserious are Republicans about defeating Barack Obama in November? So unserious that, in Iowa, at least, they came painfully close on Tuesday night to making Rick Santorum their putative standard-bearer.

Mr. Santorum, the former congressman and senator of Pennsylvania, came within eight votes of defeating former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. It was the closest finish in the history of the Hawkeye State caucuses.

Santorum bills himself as the conservative alternative to Mr. Romney. But saying you're a conservative doesn't mean you are one. (Think John McCain.)

Oh, indeed, the Virginian (ne Pennsylvanian) has the corner on the theological wing of the GOP. But Santorum is a disaster when it comes to economics. He's a recidivist big-government conservative all too prone to rationalizing his big-government proclivities.

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: baggage; ia2012; primary; santorum; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
This is the closest thing Rick Santorum has to a hometown paper. It is the biggest newspaper in the 18th congressional district which Santorum represented before his 1994 election to the U.S. Senate.

It is not a liberal or even a RINO newspaper. If it actually endorsed a GOP primary candidate, I predict it would be that nutcase Ron Paul.

Still, you will see this editorial being quoted widely by those who want to trash a decent, consistent conservative who has the best chance of winning.

Santorum is not perfect. But on his worst day, he is still slightly more conservative than George W. Bush. On his best day, he gets into the same ballpark as Ronald Reagan.

1 posted on 01/05/2012 6:40:48 AM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I’m just happy that the phrase “big government” is finally becoming anathema along the lines of the words, “Liberal”, “Progressive”, “Socialist”, etc.


2 posted on 01/05/2012 6:44:12 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

More crap from the pro-Obama Socialists


3 posted on 01/05/2012 6:44:14 AM PST by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Maybe this one is more to your liking.

http://www.wwltv.com/news/national/136720648.html


4 posted on 01/05/2012 6:49:09 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Politicians judge themselves by what they say.

Voters judge politicians by what they have done.

Since Conservatives conserve, what has Santorum done to conserve, preserve, and otherwise protect something as important as the US Constitution?

BTW, keep in mind that the US Constitution trumps any State’s Constitution.


5 posted on 01/05/2012 6:50:33 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Using Rick Santorum and RR in the same sentence is an insult to thinking conservatives.

Santorum lost his own state by 18 points, his social views will assure that women vote for Obama in even higher numbers than in 08, and he is a big gov’t solutions political animal. Reagan was the anti-thesis of most of what Santorum’s record (not his rhetoric) shows him to be.


6 posted on 01/05/2012 6:50:51 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Santorum is the last candidate I can vote for. Anyone else is on their own.


7 posted on 01/05/2012 6:53:20 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Santorum may not be perfect, but when Romney is the alternative, what else can voters do?


8 posted on 01/05/2012 6:55:08 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Santorum is the last candidate I can vote for. Anyone else is on their own.”
____________

I’m not convinced that we’ve seen all of the options.


9 posted on 01/05/2012 6:58:35 AM PST by elvis-lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

This is quite a shocking editorial. As you have noted, this is not some liberal rag. This is the newspaper where Chris Ruddy first worked reporting on Vince Foster’s “suicide”. This paper led the charge to have Clinton impeached. This is a newspaper with a decidedly conservative bent.

I agree with them that Santorum has some flaws in his record. He voted for the perscription drug benefit and no child left behind. However, weighing that against Romneycare. No contest. I’ll take Santorum’s baggage any day over Mittens. Sontorum may not be perfect, but he’s still very conservative and will look to cut the size of the government.


10 posted on 01/05/2012 6:58:46 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The three thing IA accomplished:

1) Gave Santorum some momentum. Whether he can maintain it or nt not is yet to be seen. My gut is he has the backbone for it.
Does anyone believe the MSM will not do whatever it takes to destroy him?

2)It got Newt fired up. He is ready to rip Rinomney’s head off. Just the thought of it makes me smile.haha
In my not so humble opinion he should use surrogates to do his dirty work.
While he pretends to take the high road like Obama and Romney.

3)Willard didn’t advance despite spending gobbly goops of money..haha
Mr Savy Business man payed way to much for his votes.


11 posted on 01/05/2012 7:00:12 AM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

SMEAR

Oh look, a Santorum-bashing article.

Gosh imagine that.

12 posted on 01/05/2012 7:00:29 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Santorum is our only remaining conservative choice, and he is the longest of long shots, baggage and all.


13 posted on 01/05/2012 7:03:11 AM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“I’m Number One” as sung by:

Palin
Trump
Romney
Bachmann
Perry
Cain
Gingrich
Santorum

Huntsman needs to be on standby. He might still get a chance to be #1, at the rate this campaign season is going.

Santorum is just now being introduced to the MSM/Dem/Elite Republican attack machines.


14 posted on 01/05/2012 7:05:07 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
Santorum lost his own state by 18 points

That says a lot right there. Santorum is a very weak candidate. He won't appeal to independents. He his too bland, too dull. No comparison to Reagan in that department.

So what are our options? I guess it's go with Newt.

15 posted on 01/05/2012 7:05:15 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Sorry MSM opinions don’t cut it any more.

I scarcely give a s....er....smelly Obama.


16 posted on 01/05/2012 7:08:55 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
As I see it, there are only these alternatives, none of them good:

  1. Cast your lot with Rick Perry whose brand of compassionate conservatism identifies more with illegal aliens, their employers and their professors over displaced American workers and intact families as Santorum's brand does.
  2. Cast your lot with the nutcase Ron Paul and hope the Islamofacist countries of the world just stay as quiet as he claims they well.
  3. Cast your lot with Mitt Romney and hope you get the pre-Massachussets governor version of a decent businessman rather the RINO government version.
  4. Cast your lot with Newt Gingrich and hope you get the 90s version firebrand conservative instead of the more recent version denouncing rightwing social engineering and embracing global warming.

Santorum is the alternative which easily carries the least risk. Just watching how the gay mafia and the enemedia reacts confirms it.

17 posted on 01/05/2012 7:10:40 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Dossier on Rick Santorum v1.12
"If you're a conservative, there really is only one place to go right now. I would even argue farther than that. If you're a Republican, if you're a Republican in the broadest sense, there is only one place to go right now and that's Mitt Romney." –Rick Santorum, 02/1/2008 [source]

“I came to the House as a real deficit hawk, but I am no longer a deficit hawk. I’ll tell you why. I had to spend the surpluses. Deficits make it easier to say no.” –Rick Santorum, 02/5/2003 [source]

"One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a libertarianish Right. They have this idea that people should be left alone, do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and our regulations low, that we shouldn't get involved in the bedroom, that we shouldn't get involved in cultural issues. That is not how traditional conservatives view the world." –Rick Santorum, 08/04/2005 [source]

"Don’t give me this idea — I hear this: ‘Oh, you’re a moralist. You’re trying to impose your values.’ Everybody’s trying to impose their values. That’s what America’s about." –Rick Santorum, 12/29/2011 [source]

- #1 most lobbied member of Congress in 2006.

- Wrote an article in 2008 titled Vote For Foreign Aid.

- Endorsed pro-abortionist Arlen Specter who has a 0% NRLC rating.

- Has argued a position of 'touchback amnesty' and advocates increased immigration levels.
Some additional points from here:
- A prolific supporter of earmarks, having requested billions of dollars for pork projects in Pennsylvania while he was in Congress. Perhaps recognizing the sign of the times, Santorum finally reversed his position in 2010, saying that he was opposed to them , but one must remain skeptical about his sincerity. As recently as 2009, he said, “I’m not saying necessarily earmarks are bad. I have had a lot of earmarks. In fact, I’m very proud of all the earmarks I’ve put in bills. I’ll defend earmarks.”

- An examination of his scores in the NTU rating of Congress shows that Santorum compiled a very strong record on taxes and spending in the first four years of each of his two Senate terms, then a sharp swing to below the Senate Republican average in the Congress before his reelection campaign.

- In the 2003-2004 session of Congress, Santorum sponsored or cosponsored 51 bills to increase spending, and failed to sponsor or co-sponsor even one spending cut proposal. In his last Congress (2005-2006), he had one of the biggest spending agendas of any Republican -- sponsoring more spending increases than Republicans Lisa Murkowski, Lincoln Chafee and Thad Cochran or Democrats Herb Kohl, Evan Bayh and Ron Wyden.

- Santorum also supported raising congressional pay at least three times, in 2001, 2002, and 2003.

- He voted NO on raising the minimum wage in 1995 and 2005. But on the same day he voted NO in 2005, he sponsored an amendment that would increase the minimum wage, which he later boasted about to skeptical voters in a 2006 campaign brochure he released called “50 Things You Didn’t Know About Rick Santorum.”

- In the same “50 Things” campaign brochure, Santorum boasts about sponsoring a bill to regulate “price gouging and unfair pricing by the big oil companies.” This contradicts his opposition to a “windfall profits tax” that Democrats tried to impose on oil companies in 2005. He also voted YES on Sarbanes-Oxley, which was an overreaching bill that tried to tighten accounting regulations following the Enron scandal.
Also see: Rick Santorum the Pro-Life Statist

Santorum's Voting Record (in process of sourcing)
- Voted YES in 2003 for Medicare Part D / Prescription Drug Benefit mandate.
- Voted YES for airline bailouts in 2001.
- Voted YES for the 1996 anti-gun Lautenberg Amendment which strips citizens of gun ownership rights if convicted of certain misdemeanors.
- Voted for the Gun Manufacturers Liability Act of 1994 prohibiting the sale of hand guns with safety devices.
- Voted against Death Tax repeal in 2003.
- Voted for the federal regulation of farms requiring that large farms construct animal waste treatment facilities.
- Voted YES for Bushs' No Child Left Behind and other national testing initiatives.
- Voted for affirmative action (later voted against it).
- Voted for Minimum Wage increases (Flipped on this several times).
- Voted for federal funds for military operations in Bosnia.
- Voted to cut Trident II D-5 missiles several times.
- Voted against the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts funding numerous times.
- Voted to seize private property to designate 7 million acres of Cal. desert as a wilderness area.
- Voted against the first amendment and for lobbying restrictions and regulations.
- Voted for the Motor Voter law several times.
- Voted to limit Striker Replacement of union thugs.
- Voted on the FY 94 Clinton budget, which contained at that time the largest tax increase in U.S. history.
- Voted against SDI several times.
- Voted against Hunter amendment that sought to require the Defense Department to ask individuals entering the armed forces if they are homosexuals. (He later switched to the more conservative position on this).
- Voted against school choice early in his career. (He later switched to the more conservative position on this).
- Voted against both the 1991, 1992 spending freeze and voted for numerous large Bush II Budgets.
- Voted for tabaco tax increases (1998).
- Voted against the exemption of banks with assets of less than $250 million from the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (1998).
- Voted for the Chemical Weapons Treaty of 1997 that the ACU said, "violated U.S. constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure, ceded U.S. national sovereignty to international agencies, and threatened U.S. defense forces".
- Voted for Kassenbaum amendment to the Ryan White Reauthorization which allowed for funds to be used to promote homosexuality or intravenous drug use.
- Voted for the 2005 highway bill that included thousands of wasteful earmarks, including the Bridge to Nowhere.
- Voted to continue funding the Bridge to Nowhere rather than send the money to rebuild New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
- Sponsored a bill to extend milk subsidies in 2005, which he claimed he did to “save countless Pennsylvania dairy farmers.”

18 posted on 01/05/2012 7:13:14 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Santorum is a very weak candidate. He won't appeal to independents. He his too bland, too dull. No comparison to Reagan in that department.

What irritated me with Santorum in the debates was that he would get very defensive at times. When he did, he also sounded shrill and whiney when trying to make his points.

If he does get any more momentum/traction in the near future, he absolutely must employ a professional speaking coach.
19 posted on 01/05/2012 7:16:13 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Good link at the right of the article in the Pittsburgh paper to Tebow and Denver’s chances against the Steelers.


20 posted on 01/05/2012 7:16:26 AM PST by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson