This article is wrong in almost everything the author asserts.
Oh, please. This article is absurd.
“The Guardian”....more left wing than NBC.
“The self-described conservative journalist Andrew Sullivan says...”
LOL!!!
“Even if Romney somehow wins the nomination, he won’t be “the pragmatic, problem-solving Mitt Romney” of yore, says [David] Frum, but a new Foxified version”
LOLOLOL!!!
Oh man, this guy is killing me!
Look to your own back garden, Limey. The UK is populated by dhimmis willing and eager to pay the jizyah. You’ve lost all right to criticize.
Who allowed MsNBC and CNN to manipulate the “debates”?..
What idiot(s) allowed this.. Republican officials have a death wish..
And FOX News don’t seem to see anything wrong?........
Well isn’t THAT SPECIAL?... A Very compassionate suicidal bi-partisanship..
I WANT NAMES... who allowed this,...
Horse sht!
Yes, the article misses the mark. But I do see a very determined editorial level support for Romney by Fox News. It’s not out in the open like an endorsement would be but it is obvious to most Freepers.
Why would Fox do such a dumb thing? It hurts their reputation with their most loyal supporters (people like you and me) and it damages the image we have of basically good guys like Brit Hume and Fred Barnes.
TIN HATS ON
A possible answer: Obama/Murdoch backscratching. Murdoch lays off of Obama, supports Obama’s choice for the GOP nomination (Romney) and Obama calls off the dogs on the E-Mail scandal and the Justice Dept working to destroy the Murdoch empire. A few conservations over drinks with the right people would send the message. I think it’s been sent.
TIN HATS OFF
Anything from the nazis at the Guardian makes this story suspect, and adding Jonathan to the mix makes this story incredible and unbelievable.
Next...?
Please; Fox News could 'do more'; but, at same time; we must hope; they do not 'do less'. . .
A business is a business is a business....
So be it.