To: Stoat
#1: Why would the abuse only 2 of the nine?
#2: Why would another of the boys say they are lying?
#3: Why would they do something that would be so obvious to most heterosexuals (gays molesting/assaulting boys)?
#4: Why don't I believe this, yet I believe Sandusky did assault boys?
4 posted on
12/01/2011 2:51:38 PM PST by
DallasDeb
(usafa06mom)
To: DallasDeb
#1: Why would the abuse only 2 of the nine?
Perhaps they didn't...perhaps the police only had enough evidence to charge based upon what they had from two victims. The police investigation is ongoing; it's possible that additional charges may be filed in the future.#2: Why would another of the boys say they are lying?
Any variety of reasons, including that the boy did not witness the abuse and honestly believes what he says.
#3: Why would they do something that would be so obvious to most heterosexuals (gays molesting/assaulting boys)?
Considering that homosexual couples are a politically and legally protected class, they may have felt that they were untouchable.
#4: Why don't I believe this, yet I believe Sandusky did assault boys?
I would be hard pressed to tell anyone the reason why they believe something :-)
6 posted on
12/01/2011 2:58:34 PM PST by
Stoat
(If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
To: DallasDeb
I have the same 4 "Whys" that you do but will add another. Why, if they are so concerned about the welfare of children did they get
only boys? Are there no problem girls that need help?
Having said that, I'm willing to leave it up to a jury, which will, presumably, hear all the evidence.
16 posted on
12/01/2011 3:14:41 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson