Sorry Carry, I my time is unlimited, and I draw that line at responding to agenda pieces. If you can give a personal summary of the offending parts of both the Lautenberg Bill and the 1996 revidion to the the GFSZ Act, which has not been challenged in SCOTUS, I’ll take it seriously and respond. Until then, I agree that gun ownership is a Constitutional right that can be restricted under some circumstances, as been upheld in the SCOTUS. Two of those circumstances, IMO, would be for people who represent a direct threat to their spouses, and for non licensed indviduals within 1000 feet of a school. I do not agree that either incidence constitutes “gun grabbing,” and apparently neither does the NRA. Furthermore, I challenge you to name a Republican candidate who is running against either law.