It is simply vile for anyone claiming to be a conservative to take pleasure in such, which certainly betrays an even baser set of motives. Note the timing of these "allegations": They are "coming out" just as people are getting the bad news about Gingrich. It is therefore likely intended to inoculate conservatives from going back to Mr. Cain, global-warming-gun-grabber Gingrich being a trap, the latest version of the famed Fred Thompson fan dance if you will. Those considering themselves supporters of Mr. Gingrich have only to wait for the ol' RINO swan dive.
There have been plenty of years for this to come out with Mr. Cain in a prominent public role, and it didn't. I call BS until I see truly compelling and unambiguous evidence otherwise, and whatever-you-can-misconstrue doesn't count.
I might have given your word consideration as such a long time FReeper, but I have looked at your posts on this thread and you have convinced me not to take you seriously. The sheer number of instances in which you claim to channel the details and motives this supposed "relationship" shows that you are working off a fevered imagination, not information.
I am scratching my had about why this was posted for me. I am assuming Herman Cain is innocent of these charges until I see something substantial. My only concern this evening is for his family.
Sorry I read every article.
When Cain says he is “trying to help her financially” and them the cult member ATTACK her because of financial issues, your defense falls due to it’s own failure.
Apparently Cain didn’t do much to help her financial situation. Cain sure has questionable judgement in women, doesn’t he?
Amazing how the purist all of a sudden drop their character issues when the Cult leader is shown to be a clay footed idol.
The only ones on FR that are betraying Conservative Values are the Cain and Newt supporters.