I’m not a Caniac, however, it was Newt, not Cain, who made the revealing gaffe in this case.
I’m not a Caniac, however, it was Newt, not Cain, who made the revealing gaffe in this case.
I’m not a Caniac, however, it was Newt, not Cain, who made the revealing gaffe in this case.
“Wow states fact and gets attacked for it. How surprising coming from Cainiacs. Yeah it was a joke and people need to develops a sense of humor, but Newt is talking practicality. Gaffs like that will not endear Cain to the general voting public. Newt understands things like that, Cain has yet to learn it, apparently.”
Cain’s priority is to win THE NOMINATION. The general election is a year away. By then, this crap will be long-gone - particularly because he now has a lawyer that will deal with lying bimbos, once and for all.
Newt is a NO vote right after Romney..some of us have long memories on Newty. His baggage is not personal with me, its political...stick finger in wind, which way is wind blowing, thats where Newt heads...He talks good, he has years of practice in the college class room. His actions suck wind big time..
As usual you’ve got it completely bass ackwards. No one believes Anita Hill is anything more than a liberal shill, and Cain’s jesting about her supporting him is seen as something everyone should laugh about. You and your fellow Perrywinkles are completely clueless.
“Newt is talking practicality.”
Newt is being an opportunist at best, duplicitous at worst, and the Perrycrutons weighing in are icing on the cake. Oh yeah, we should take Anita Hill seriously enough not to joke about her? Give me a break, Anita Hill was the nadir of the liberal’s sleaze attacks, they didn’t work then and they won’t work now, and Gingrich’s sniping about it shows just how flaky he is.
He and Callistra are the perfect picture of Elite GOP Establishment......maybe that's because they are?
He was Speaker of the House and she was an intern under him.
Like I said, Newt's definition of "practicality" is old-school "reaching across the aisle," "bi-partisanship," and coddling "Independents."
This wasn't about practicality. It was full-on Liberal-pandering by reinforcing the dictates of political correctness that there are certain topics to which we must bow down and be reverent at all times, REGARDLESS of how ridiculous, vapid or vile ACTUAL SITUATIONS involving those topics factually are.
Humor is our strongest weapon against political correctness. Even Alinsky knew that.