To: marktwain
Let's not forget the Clinton's overwhelming desire to reoccupy the Whitehouse. If you see her talking, you know she's lying. I saw her saying she was done with "public service" just a week ago.
She's positioning herself to be the savior of the democRats when Obama completes his self destruction. When you see Carville, Lanny Davis and the other Clintonistas crawl out from under their rock, you know something is up.
4 posted on
10/29/2011 9:20:22 AM PDT by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: oneolcop
Carville’s been out every time recently saying he’s worried that Obama can’t get re-elected.
The fact the networks let him on to say this crap is clear that the lib media leaders are shifting away from Obama.
6 posted on
10/29/2011 9:23:10 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: oneolcop
Clinton probably answered the question completely unaware of the implications of her response.
Reports of her intelligence are greatly exaggerated.
7 posted on
10/29/2011 9:26:28 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: oneolcop; All
I think it's all part of their master plan. Put Bamster in office - since he was a shoe in with race, media cover up/disregard of his "no record/history", etc. Let Bam take the country as close to socialism as he possibly can, then let Billary & Co. ride in to save the day...for the Dims.
Was Bam sinisterly set-up all along? Time will tell what is in this very tangled web.
16 posted on
10/29/2011 9:54:04 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: oneolcop
“Let’s not forget the Clinton’s overwhelming desire to reoccupy the Whitehouse. If you see her talking, you know she’s lying.”
Roger that. Clinton, Obama, Holder, Napolitano, et al, they’re peas in the same pod.
23 posted on
10/29/2011 11:49:59 AM PDT by
corvus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson