[The Theophilus]

Did you not support Willard, the last election.

Interesting posting history, org.whodat. It seems that every post you have on Perry is a hate-filled lie. No where did I see any post questioning "Willard". Since Perry is seen as the only real competition to keep "Willard" from winning the nomination, and all you can do is implement Progressive Alinsky techniques in a feeble and laughable attempt to hurt Perry it is quite clear that you are for "Willard" taking the nomination since that is really the only positive effect from your childish behavior.

[NYC-Conserv]

He’s FreeRepublic’s residen OWS equivalent.

A squatter on every Perry thread, has no idea what he wants, just spews hate and looks foolish and sophmoric

[org.whodat]

Roflol, the man that is nearly dead last is the only one that can stop Willard, LOL, that is rich. HEE, HEE, have another shot it is early, but do watch when you try walking.

[Grunthor]

“Perry is seen as the only real competition to keep “Willard” from winning the nomination”

Not by a majority in any national poll in several weeks now.

[Prokopton]

It seems that every post you have on Perry is a hate-filled lie.

Since Perry is seen as the only real competition to keep "Willard" from winning the nomination,

First you berate another poster for a hate-filled lie, and then you post an incredibly obvious lie: "that Since Perry is seen as the only real competition to keep "Willard" from winning the nomination,".

The hypocrisy of many Perry supporters is monumental. The "projection" they demonstrate would bring a tear to the eye of the most ardent progressive.