Posted on 10/16/2011 2:32:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
"I'm the only problem-solver in the group," Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain told Mike Huckabee in an August Fox News appearance. Well, many candidates bill themselves as problem-solvers. In fact, if we asked any candidate running for any office in the entire country, practically every one would likely define him- or herself as able to solve problems. Yet we know that politicians, as a rule, create and worsen problems rather than fix them.
.....Overconfidence turns the hopeful campaign pronouncements of otherwise successful people into dismal policy. In the end, Americans usually end up with more laws, less freedom, and no money.
The question is what type of problem-solver Cain will be as president......
Examining Herman Cain's record leaves serious questions about which type of problem-solver he is. In a column published October 20, 2008, Cain blamed conservatives' "economic illiteracy" for their opposition to the freshly passed Trouble Assets Relief Program.
"Wake up people!" admonished Cain with typical candor. "Owning a part of the major banks in America is not a bad thing. We could make a profit while solving a problem." Cain goes on to defend Treasury's decision to post-legislatively change TARP to buy preferred stock in banks rather than toxic mortgages. "You got a problem with that?" asks Cain. Apparently he didn't.
Cain reassures "free market purists" that the Treasury's stock purchase is "not nationalization because that would require government to own at least 51% of the entity for an indefinite period of time." (This is a relief, because some of us thought that government would use this foot in the door to force mergers, control salaries, and set lending rules. Oh, wait...)...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
If you are a business producing a retailed product and your income tax went down from 35% to 9%, and you got competition, you saying that prices won’t dive?
I understand it, I understand the allure of it and I also understand the reality of how Washington gets a hold of these things.
I read in the Washington Post on line that there has been a bit of back tracking on the 9% income tax on poverty level citizens. I want another source but my gut told me that was coming anyway. The next perversion of it will be exemption on those over 65. We already have an exemption for economic empowerment zones which sounds like liberal speak for bad neighborhoods.
Pretty soon you wont even recognize it because it's a political loser.
What on earth do you mean by, “My Taxes are already paid free and clear, That is the way I like things.”
Are you referring to IRS withholding from your paycheck? Are you arguing for the status quo? How are your taxes “already paid free and clear”??
They will consume goods that have become cheaper.
>> They do not realize that due to elimination of hidden taxes, prices would ease under the Cain plan
The plan is revenue neutral; net taxes will NOT be decreasing. They’ll merely be shifted around (adding in another huge entirely new revenue stream for Congress to play with).
Across the board price decreases are fantasy math, similar to the Congressional fantasy of promising spending cuts later if you give in to tax increases now.
Consumption has made our economy stagnant. We have been borrowing to consume and now that has come to an end. The solution is to save and produce more.
The only way to justify that statement is to ignore the free market which inevitably lowers prices through competition.
Where does it say they wouldn't be taxed? If they weren’t to be taxed he would have put that in his ‘well thought out plan’. He took the time to put in the ghetto tax breaks because that was important to him.
Do you really think tax a federal sales tax plan would tax different states on some things but not others?
Some states tax used items too.
Thanks for the link, I am watching it now, but would still like a writeup.
I am speaking of savings. Monies that you have already been taxed on, and now this butthead wants
to tax me again at %9 and tell me its a great new beginning?
The Laffer curve will come into play. 35% is probably well to the right of the Laffer peak. This 27% will open up doors for economic development.
No its a consumption tax, dont spend anything and you dont pay it. What part of lower overall tax dont you understand
If retailers’ tax overheads go down, competition will force prices down. Result in purchasing power is better than the status quo.
And even then, I'm leery of authorizing the federal government to enact a sales tax. For that is a new tax... and who knows what the next party in power will do to it.
It's best not to give the authority to the government at all.
“No its a consumption tax, dont spend anything and you dont pay it.”
Great! No food, elec, heat, Rx, etc etc. Sign me up./sarc.
That’s the idea. The bill that establishes the new tax, will also repeal the old.
You’re paying more than 9% in hidden taxes for these things now.
Sections: [ Policy Recommendations with each section]
Energizing American Jobs and Security
Our Conservative Philosophy
ENERGIZING AMERICA
The Failed Current Approach
BARACK OBAMAS INCOHERENT ENERGY POLICY
Our Approach
AN ALL-AMERICAN ENERGY POLICY
American Energy, American Jobs
DEVELOPING AMERICAS DOMESTIC RESOURCES IN THE GULF
American Energy, American Jobs
PENNSYLVANIAS MARCELLUS SHALE
Maintaining Reliable and Affordable Energy
POWERING AMERICAS ENGINES OF COMMERCE
Renewable Energy
THE VIRGINIA CASE STUDY
Maintaining Reliable and Affordable Energy
EPA REFORM
Energizing America: Jobs and Security
A NEW PRESIDENT, A RENEWED AMERICA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.