A poster asks some questions in Post #180. I take some time to make a long, thoughtful informed reply and then I get their reply in Post #121 (this poster always posts to #1 so no one can follow the tread to see what they’re responding to or how they’re harassing a poster).
They just want to make negative posts to make it appear you are not cooperating or that you are attacking someone when you are not — anything but have a meaningful discussion about this election and the candidates. Where do they learn these tactics?
My reply to that poster was in Post #202.
MNJohnnie is a Johnny-One-Note...
The response of this poster is continually:
“I did a great job in Texas so make me President” is not an agenda...
OR
It is all “I’m a great guy, look at the great things I have done”.
OR
Sorry a Cult of Personality candidate is no more attractive when you slap a Conservative label on him.
OR
“I’m a great guy, look at the great things I have done”. Sorry a Cult of Personality candidate is no more attractive when you slap a Conservative label on him.”
Over and over and over.
My answer to him was that I’d rather see someone with a history to point to than someone that relies solely on campaign promises.