Scraping the bottom to post articles from Motherjones.com aren’t you?
Aquila - Herman Cain was the chairman of the compensation committee that oversaw pay and bonus’ for executives and other
positions. The bonuses that he approved were in line for the time when the entire company was seeing high profits in
the late 90’s. Bonus’s are based on the previous year performance. The financial problem with Aquila didn’t show up until mid 2001 during the recession. There was a Pension and Benefits committee and a retirement committee. Herman
Cain was not on either one of those. Thus Cain didn’t come across the activity and paperwork to see what was going
on with these committees. The lawsuit that was filed named all sorts of people at the top even if they didn’t have
basic oversight at issue with the lawsuit. Class action lawsuits tend to always do this. The MotherJones article author took a few general details and then made all sorts of claims that weren’t in the lawsuit they referenced. It is typical of liberal writers being lazy.
Here is the link to the lawsuit paperwork.
https://motherjones.com/files/1232_cid_3_amended_consolidated_complaint.pdf
Has Cain ever addressed that?
It certainly would be brought up in the general election by Obama.
Seriously, is that the best you can come up with?