Replies

To: Crim

Shouldn’t this be covered by property rights?

6 posted on 09/24/2011 1:08:33 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)

To: GeronL

Shouldn’t this be covered by property rights?

You mean back when there were property rights?

28 posted on 09/24/2011 2:50:43 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)

To: GeronL

Shouldn’t this be covered by property rights?

Yes, it should... it's a bad ruling. Needs to be appealed. And that judge needs to seek employment elsewhere.

36 posted on 09/24/2011 4:08:50 PM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794