It is tiresome and insulting, isn't it???
I mean, it's not like his former chief of staff was a Merck lobbyist who donated a bunch of money to him, right?
And it's nothing like his current chief of staff at the time was the Texas head of a group that Merck created to lobby for Gardasil mandates.
And of course, he didn't meet with Merck on the day of the signing of the executive order.
And it would be ludicrous to think that he would accept a $5k contribution on that SAME DAY.
See? Nothing to see there at all. I can't imagine why people keep mentioning it. /s