Lakewood woman's lawsuit forces police to return confiscated firearms(OH)

Buckeye Firearms Association ^ | 16 September, 2011 | Chad D. Baus

[paratrooper82]

God help me if I catch a “sneak and peek” in my private home some night in the early hours! I would shove that Thompson Sub-Machine gun so far up a freddy’s ass they could taste gun oil! Not to mention I would stick my size 13 jump boot right behind the Thompson for good measure!

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees

[PoloSec]

These stories of gun confiscation never mention if they also took the ammo. Guns without ammo is no more useful than sticks and stones.

[paratrooper82]

Maybe the American people should start confiscating the cops firearms for our own safety? Both in their homes and at work!

How would that sound?

[texmexis best]

Which law is it that requires a court order before proprty is returnned?

[Hot Tabasco]

when medical personnel request law enforcement to check on a patient it tells me that there is a concern for the safety and well being of the patient.

Do doctors office medical questionaires asking if you have firearms in your home indicate the same concern for the safety and well being of the patient?

[Usagi_yo]

Sounds like you have a credibility issue.

[marktwain]

“Which law is it that requires a court order before proprty is returnned?”

There is none that I know of.

It drives me crazy when the authoritarians in our society are simultaneously terrified at the thought of being held responsible for things beyond their control.

Even in Yuma, the police are reluctant to return firearms without a court order. We must make them fear the consequences through lawsuits or elections.

[Enterprise]

"Do doctors office medical questionaires asking if you have firearms in your home indicate the same concern for the safety and well being of the patient?"

NO!

Now go ahead with your next irrelevant question.

[Red Boots]

Once our medical records are all linked up through Obamacare, this kind of stuff can happen to all of us ! Can’t wait !

[paratrooper82]

look up “fusion centers” that were created after 9/11 with federal money (our tax dollars). these are nothing more than clearinghouses for personal information about Americans, e.g. medical records, cell phone records, credit card purchase records, etc.

Law enforcement used to have to obtain a warrant with probable cause to get access to this kind of private info about Americans! Not anymore, these [fusion centers] allow any law enforcement officer who wants access to have it, about your most personal info, including vets personal medical records.

In Michigan, the [fusion center] is called the Michigan Intelligence Operations Center (MIOC). visit this website and read how the mission has creep into a “health safety, welfare” program now, instead of the intended mission to prevent another terror attack!

there is no such thing as a fourth amendment protections any longer in the Constitution!

[Ken H]

All kinds of nasty surprises in the Patriot Act. I guess they had to pass the bill before we could know what was in it.

[starlifter]

“Without knowing if she made such a statement, the actions of the police cannot be adequately judged.”

Oh, I don't know. They can be adequately judged against the laws on the books.

[Enterprise]

"Oh, I don't know. They can be adequately judged against the laws on the books."

You're right. You don't know.

[starlifter]

“Oh, I don't know” is a polite way of saying I don't agree with you.

The laws on the books should be adequate to judge the actions of the police.

An analogy is the police taking your car away because you have liquor in your house...you might yourself or someone else.

Though certain copsuckers view any police action as prudent and appropriate.

[Enterprise]

"“Oh, I don't know” is a polite way of saying I don't agree with you."

I don't care if you agree. You don't know.

"An analogy is the police taking your car away because you have liquor in your house...you might yourself or someone else."

Quit drinking for tonight and come up with an analogy tomorrow that makes sense.

[cracker45]

“Wonder how many cops homes they had to raid to find all the firearms.?”

BINGO!! (BTW, I forwarded this article to the NRA.)

JC

[cracker45]

“...Without knowing if she made such a statement, the actions of the police cannot be adequately judged.”

HORSEPUCKY!! They confiscated her property absent a court order and refused to return it until legal action was filed against them. Whatsamatterwidyou??

JC

[cracker45]

“...Imagine the outcry that would ensue if they gave’em back without checking then discovered that she couldn’t legally own them — after she guns down few people.”

You have a low opinion of our veterans, eh? I’m glad you don’t live in my neighborhood or I’d be inclined to ask you to leave! SHEEEESH

JC

[Usagi_yo]

Is that what you read in what I wrote? That’s quite imaginative.

[meyer]

...But to me, when medical personnel request law enforcement to check on a patient it tells me that there is a concern for the safety and well being of the patient....

Or, more likely, the medical "official" is a flaming leftie that would love to disarm the American public "for the greater good".