Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DRey

Why does Carville imply that the Tea Party would have rejoiced (to paraphrase what he said) at the deaths at Stalingrad?


16 posted on 09/14/2011 10:59:26 PM PDT by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Explorer89

He’s referring to the guy at the Tea Party debate on Monday that yelled out his approval at letting a theoretical person with no health insurance theoretically die.


18 posted on 09/14/2011 11:02:03 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89

Democrats become unhinged when you mention the Tea Party. The Tea Party is the biggest single threat to the progressive agenda and as such they will demonize it to the ends of the earth. They are so obsessed with the Tea Party that they bring it up constantly.... strengthening the Tea Party.

The Tea Party represents a great awakening by the silent majority that stood by quietly as our country was transformed into something the founding fathers would not recognize. The Tea Party dominated the 2010 elections and is poised to dominate the 2012 election.


25 posted on 09/14/2011 11:06:03 PM PDT by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Explorer89
Why does Carville imply that the Tea Party would have rejoiced (to paraphrase what he said) at the deaths at Stalingrad?

I think he meant that the Tea Partiers are blood-thirsty war lovers, thus they would rejoice at the deaths on both sides at Stalingrad. Yes, liberals do think that way.

47 posted on 09/15/2011 3:02:25 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson