Posted on 09/14/2011 6:46:47 PM PDT by Carling
Curious. It's been two entire days now, and I haven't seen or heard from Sarah Palin on FoxNews explain how she knew something was wrong as far back as 2007.
Weak government. Power to the people. Just the way we like it.
The sea of other Perry trashers treat Perry as the enemy.
He is not. The enemy is OBama Not Perry or Newt or Cain or whoever ! If we destroy our options like the Perry astroturfers here then Obama wins . Which is the real goal for numerous concerned posters here .
Perry’s stance on illegal immigration is a legitimate concern, IMO. I’ve posted as much repeatedly on FR.
A sage observation...
I would say that his record is very Mercky...
“Would this be called a bait thread.”
Yes, it would. So in the spirit for which this thread was offered, here is a surprise for all those who think perry’s feet don’t stink. I spent a couple of hours this morning tracking back to the first thread posted on the gardasil issue before perry decided to run. Here it is with research and links. Have fun.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2736814/posts
And with any luck half of them will be there legally...
Maybe she’s hoping to hold out long enough to avoid debating candidates that are smarter than her....?
Actually I don’t think she has any intentions to run. She is making big bucks in the private sector and even she knows she has zero chance of winning.
Yeah, I’m a contractor, you see. So I hired the people. Duh.
Do you truly not believe that RP has problems and unconservative positions? Serious question, no BS.
Your desperate !
I still have my moments. :)
You said before you were a Professor. Are you both or neither?
Reagan didn’t smear individual GOP members while being paid as a member of the media.
Hahahaha!
Here’s a link to Michelle Malkin’s column about Gardisil. Read it and weep: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/09/13/the-right-and-wrong-way-to-talk-about-gardasil/
“Wow , a whole 28,000 over ten years !!
The scandal !!
LOL
You Perry haters need mental help.”
I was supporting Perry until he said he only got $5,000 when it turns out he got nearly $30,000 in campaign donations. Why did he use the $5,000 figure? Sounds like a lie to me, even if it wasn’t a quid pro non.
Point: just because a candidate gets a donation doesn’t necessarily mean he is bought off, but claiming $5,000 is the issue. Sounds slimy.
I am willing to be persuaded if Perry supporter have an answer.
If she ultimately does commit, then she has made a strategic blunder as it would have made a huge “gotcha” moment for a future debate. This story will fade within the week but it could have had legs.
Good heavens, I hope Palin announces her candidacy. I really, really want her to run. Please Sarah... run. From here on, I will support her announcing her candidacy. I will encourage it.
She’ll sink like a rock and then we will be done with this nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.