no, he's just a liberal scumbag...
Posted on 09/12/2011 5:43:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
Krugman is depressed that he has been proven wrong about everything and that the left is losing power and influence.
His blog is plagiarized from any left wing forum post: Dai
ly, Kos, Huff Po, etc. And he gets paid. tsk tsk.
““The atrocity should have been a unifying event....”
For awhile it was, against a common enemy, Islamic extremism.”
It was unifying, then the liberals remembered that they could play politics to get an upper hand and the whole liberal political correctness and propaganda machine went into action. Better the country suffer than have republicans in power. Liberals are evil and insane.
Correction: an insane inflamed rectal cavity with hemorrhoids!
You expect the New York Slimes to have any sense of decency?
Shave his head, and he looks like Lenin. Marxists of a feather.
The only thing fake here is Krugman’s Nobel Prize, which is about as legitimate as Obama’s. But, that’s how liberals take charge: they give each other awards and pat each other on the back, then they say, “Look, he’s got a Nobel Prize or an Oscar.”Exactly right. That is one of their basic MO's.
....Krugman:
...your presence is denied....
Which head are you talking about? The one attached to his neck or the one attached to his dick?
What is insane is anyone takes this politically bigoted loser seriously as an Economist
The 1st Amendment does not guarantee every fringe quack a forum to publish their extremist, ignorant ideological doctrines.
The Slimes should say "You know what Paul, your right to say something does NOT mean we have to publish your hyper bigoted, ignorant nonsense. Start you own paper if you want to publish such rubbish"
I looked up his web biography...it seems he bases his economics on science fiction
read:
According to Krugman, his interest in economics began with Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels, in which the social scientists of the future use “psychohistory” to attempt to save civilization. Since “psychohistory” in Asimov’s sense of the word does not exist, Krugman turned to economics, which he considered the next best thing.
True to form, Paul Krugman is still the same piece of sh*t he has always been.
You can always count on the NYT and it’s loathesome socialist editorial cadre to sink to the lowest form and try to stick it to the only place on Earth that would tolerate them.
Worthless trash.
Like most of us, I lead a quiet life and never expected to be exposed to the ridicule that conservatives face.
I have a question to all of us: What will it take for us (or at least me) retired gimpers to start rioting in the streets to take back our country?
I don’t know ... the building site is sacred ground. Thousands died there and I feel its like building in a grave.
In MHO, it should be made into a memorial park to the
memory of the fallen.
LLS
I don't know much about Bernie Kerik, but I am quite sure the other two would be pretty quick to disabuse anybody of the notion they were any sort of heroes. They've attended far too many funerals of real heroes.
no, he's just a liberal scumbag...
I wonder what Krugman wrote about the Wellstone memorial?
I wish, but no dice. He's not insane.
He's evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.