If I recall, it wasn't appealed to the state supreme court.
Did some court find it incorrect or are you just playing make-believe judge?
I get it. Instead of rebutting the arguments that were presented, you resort to smug personal comments.
Obama? This thread is about Rubio, remember? What the Court wrote is directly relevant here, because it refutes a crank legal theory that some here are saying disqualifies Rubio.
The only thing that court did with any legal authority was deny a citizen a right to hold the governor of Indiana accoutable for failing to vet presidential candidates. The nonsense in the decision about natural born citizenship is filled with contradictions and declares no one cited in the suit to be a natural born citizen. Therefore it has NO application nor any legal weight to any other candidate.
“If I recall, it wasn’t appealed to the state supreme court.”
There’s now this thing called ‘Google’ that’s useful for checking stuff like that. Maybe I can help with some keywords:
4/01/10 ——THIS MATTER HAS COME BEFORE THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT ON A PETITION TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION FOLLOWING THE ISSUANCE OF A DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEALS. THE PETITION WAS FILED PURSUANT TO APPELLATE RULE 57. THE COURT HAS REVIEWED THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS. ANY RECORD ON APPEAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COURT FOR REVIEW, ALONG WITH ANY AND ALL BRIEFS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL THE MATERIALS FILED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUEST TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION. EACH PARTICIPATING MEMBER OF THE COURT HAS VOTED ON THE PETITION. EACH PARTICIPATING MEMBER HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE THAT JUSTICE’S VIEWS ON THE CASE IN CONFERENCE WITH THE OTHER JUSTICES. BEING DULY ADVISED, THE COURT NOW DENIES THE APPELLANT’S PETITION TO TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION. RANDALL T. SHEPARD, CHIEF JUSTICE ALL JUSTICES CONCUR. KJ 04/05/10