Kinda unfair in that Tom Ammiano will never need a babysitter.
To: artichokegrower
From San Francisco.
Can I guess why ?
2 posted on
09/02/2011 6:06:03 AM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
(I want a Triple A president for our Triple A country)
To: artichokegrower
Senate Democrats control both houses? No wonder California is so messed up.
3 posted on
09/02/2011 6:06:39 AM PDT by
Ingtar
(Together we go broke (from a Pookie18 post))
To: artichokegrower
This means that no one is going to hire an adult to watch the kids, just older kids probably.
4 posted on
09/02/2011 6:08:25 AM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: artichokegrower
Which Union are the babysitters joining? Another CALPERS retirement plan, too?
5 posted on
09/02/2011 6:09:20 AM PDT by
traditional1
("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
To: artichokegrower
Think of the paperwork involved in this for the families
6 posted on
09/02/2011 6:09:28 AM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: artichokegrower
What a great idea! This is what we need: More in-your-face gov’t intervention when you have a 9.2 percent unemployment rate...and this for a tiny, tiny market segment. It's got to cost more to police this than it could ever hope to collect. More gov’t stupidity.
7 posted on
09/02/2011 6:15:54 AM PDT by
econjack
(Some people are dumber than soup.)
To: artichokegrower
Democratic lawmakers in Sacramento are fast-tracking a bill that would require workers compensation benefits, meal breaks and paid vacation time for all domestic employees, including nannies, housekeepers and even babysitters.Fire them. If people were to sit down and add up the total cost associated with mommy working, they'd easily find out mommy is COSTING the family when she works. They'd actually SAVE money if she quit and worked only one job - the job of being a mother. Quiting would be a win-win for both her and her family.
In this economy, there's no reason why people can't mow their own lawns or hire high school kids to do it. Those kids would love a little extra cash right now.
(Starve the Beast. We can survive without big governments money, but big government can't survive without ours! Join Operation Thrift.)
To: artichokegrower
I guess the state of Nannyfornia wants to regulate business normally conducted by a handshake.
This only encourages black markets, under-the-table dealings and a general disregard for government.
10 posted on
09/02/2011 6:17:23 AM PDT by
kidd
(S&P gives Obama an 'AA+'...Obama's only published grade)
To: artichokegrower
Will this apply to the kid if the kid watches himself?
To: artichokegrower
Lex Luthor: Bye bye California. Hello new west coast. My west coast...... Costa Del Lex. Luthorville. Marina del Lex. Otisburg - Otisburg?
13 posted on
09/02/2011 6:20:31 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: artichokegrower
I've never understood how people who fight for high union wages and benefits for themselves can be so cheap when it comes to paying the people who do work for them such as handymen, babysitters, cleaning ladies, house painters, lawn care guys...They're as "miserly" as their "corporate fat-cat" employers. They're usually the most vociferous when it comes to their outrage at what they're being charged when they get a quote, too.
My sister-in-law one time got a quote on having her kitchen wallpapered. It's a job that's charged by the roll. Well, this cheapskate put up all the easy, straight drop sections herself. When the guy came, she expected him to put up all the hard cuts, corners, windows, doorways at the same rate he originally quoted. She actually measured the places she skipped over, which was stupid because she could have easily messed up the job. She wasn't the least bit embarrassed or kind of regretful. She was proud of herself.
The liberal mindset is selfish.
18 posted on
09/02/2011 6:31:03 AM PDT by
FrdmLvr
(culture, language, borders)
To: artichokegrower
In addition, the bill would require parents to provide substitute caregivers every two hours to cover rest and meal breaks,In other words, parents have to hire another employee to cover the first employee while he/she is on break. That means the costs will skyrocket.
If you and your spouse work, it would be wise to go over your budget. It would be cheaper if only one of you worked. (Remember to pay attention to your "new" net income when you do it, because this would also put you in a lower tax bracket)
To: artichokegrower
First they went after lemonade stands, now they are going after babysitters. Hey America! How’s that nanny state working out for ya?!
20 posted on
09/02/2011 6:35:35 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Coming November 2012 - Bedtime For Obozo.)
To: artichokegrower
This workers comp for baby sitters is a priority of the SEIU. They want to organize babysitters into a union and then get them into community organizing. Makes me want to puke.
To: artichokegrower
This is going to backfire in ways I’m going to enjoy. Most of the people this will affect will be upper-middle-class types who like to hire illegals to watch their kids for pennies. Once those illegals are no longer so cheap, the demand for them will fall... see where I’m going?
29 posted on
09/02/2011 7:36:41 AM PDT by
A_perfect_lady
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: artichokegrower
“connected” daycare centers looking to drive out the competition.
31 posted on
09/02/2011 8:02:03 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
To: artichokegrower
If you have to go through all this just to get a babysitter, stay home. I’m sure restaurants and theaters will get along just fine without the business and no one will lose their job.
To: artichokegrower
Remind the last person who leaves CA to turn the lights off.
5.56mm
35 posted on
09/02/2011 9:36:35 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson