You know...I think I understand this thing now.
He wasn’t insane.
Maybe he had some anger issues from steroids.
His primary impetus, and this is what is being missed, was war.
He is not a fascist, but he points out how the cry “fascist” is made against any dissent with, what we call in America “liberalism”.
He is not a monster, but he points out how the cry “monster” is made against any dissent with, what we call in America “liberalism”.
He is not a racist, but he points out how the cry “racist” is made against any dissent with, what we call in America “liberalism”.
He is not a bigot, but he points out how the cry “bigot” is made against any dissent with, what we call in America “liberalism”.
He is not insane, but he points out how the cry “insanity” is made against any dissent with, what we call in America “liberalism”.
He engaged in warfare. Yes, he was alone, but the psychology, the planning, the act itself was directed against what he perceived to be a bastion of anti-Western Civilization and a “camp” which, if examined closely, turns out to be nothing more than an indoctrination camp that brainwashes children against Western Civilization’s ideals.
This was a one-man war.
I see no other way to interpret it. He took it upon himself to engage in warfare against the Marxist “suicidal genocide” which he considered to be the primary enemy of his own nation: Norway.
I am open to other interpretations of what happened and (more importantly) why it happened.
People who want to make one of the above accusations, save it for yourself.
Excellent. This is how I interpret the man and his actions.
More, I think there will be others like him as the media and the elites bury their heads in the sand, the mobs fed the daily diet of propaganda parrot “insane”, “fascist”, “bigot”, etc, and the Islamization of the West proceeds. There will be others from among those who don’t live in the safe Hillsboroughs and Pleasant Valleys.