[PA-RIVER]

Dear Vick,

Patiently waiting for your reply...

So look at:
Entry field 3 “Twin” Box and Entry field 7g “Yes” box.
Twin Box needed to be replaced with empty check box)

Then look at:
Entry field 4, “1st” and “2nd” box.
Birth order needed to be filled with empty box)

Much appreciated.

[PA-RIVER]

Vick , I'll check with you again, later. I guess You must be looking at the check boxes? Also, Let me know what software you are using to “Overlay” or “Opaque” adjustment's to see these differences in the boxes.

Don't include the back ground in the boxes, as that is a different computer layer to our presidents BC copy.

Thanks again, eagerly looking forward to the technical explanation and graphic... help this old man out!

[Vickery2010]

"Dear Vick,

Patiently waiting for your reply..."

Holy crap! Has it really been over TWO HOURS since you asked me to do some graphic work for you? I apologize for not dropping everything I was doing so I could get to work doing the factchecking you obviously haven't bothered to do at any point to date, considering that you just pointed me to a tiny graphic on somebody else's website. Your patience obviously knows no bounds to put up with a whole two hours of waiting.

Anyhow, here's the comparison of the "1st" and "2nd" boxes.

Incredibly similar? Yes. And not surprising considering that they represent identical pre-printed boxes on the same form. But they're not pixel-for-pixel identical. Which is exactly what you claimed they were.

Maybe you think somebody cut-and-pasted the box but then fudged with a bunch of individual pixels around the edge to brighten or darken the black, and then completely changed the interior of the box?

Also, you should watch the video I posted above. There are some other people who found some 'identical' looking details in images that they deem quite suspicious and evidence of fraud. You clearly have a lot in common.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDdzNSXDaRI