[DoughtyOne]

There has been no "interaction" between me and the AM or JimRob.  Then I'm curious why would you state I tried to involve Jim as a fact.  I'm also curious why you would state I tried to get the Mod involved, since that seems to infer I tried to have them do something more than the commonplace deletion of a problematic post.  If they didn't contact you, why would you refernce either of them?

Frankly, they know what happens when you throw rocks at people who buy ink by the railcar.  This is electronic digital text.  I don't buy it.  And if you have some differences with people, talking to them is better than throwing rocks.

S'later. It has been fun!  I don't really enjoy being adversarial towards others.  I don't run from it either.

[Gargantua]

If you think I have been in contact with either Jim or the (h)AM, ask 'em. They'll tell you what I already know. Why do you insist on being a japish caricature of a smart person? Just a bit more actual thought, and a bit less hormonal imbalance, and you could actually get there.

The "ink by a railcar" refers not to my fanciful dalliances here, but my occupation. You do persist with the untoward assumptions, do you not?! My, my!

As for your insisting on sprinting into conflict, remember that my first enscription to you here was to politely ask you where I had been deceitful.

That polite request was responded to with your snotty comment about "being required to play Daddy and lead me around by the hand." Remember, trouble-maker?

That, Sissiphus, was you casting the first unpleasant stone. That I since have responded in kind doesn't change who it was that begat the unlpleassantries between you and me.

And you meant to say "imply," not "infer." Typical rookie error. Won't go on your permanent record, just keep an eye on that, OK?

;^|