Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Where would you have put those "surpluses" other than in interest bearing T-bills?

Actually, if I were responsible for investing the nation's retirement fund, I would NOT invest it in the nation's checkbook. That's like an employer taking the employee's pension fund and investing it entirely in the employer's common stock.

Diversify, Diversify, Diversify...

248 posted on 06/26/2011 12:28:35 PM PDT by Bernard (The only Fair Tax is the Tax that Taxes YOU and not ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Bernard
The problem is that the huge amounts of money involved would have a major influence on the markets. The temptation for political and other mischief would be enormous. Clinton talked about investing the SS surplus (when there was one) in the stock market. Can anyone imagine what the Dems would do with such power not to mention insider information.

I spoke with a long time former Trustee of Social Security about the SSTF. He said if it were up to him, he would eliminate it and make SS a line item in the budget. It would force legislators to deal with the actual costs of the program present and future and provide more transparency and understanding for the public. The reality is that SS and Medicare are pay as you go programs. All the Trust Funds represent are the full faith and credit of the USG to pay the benefits.

FYI: The SSTF and other trust funds are included in the $14.3 trillion national debt as "Intragovernmental Holdings." It amounts to $4.6 trillion.

267 posted on 06/26/2011 4:45:17 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson