This is actually pretty funny, because if you think about it, if guns are illegal, who will have guns? Legislators and criminals. And while legislators think they are protected because they have guns, that they are in *control* because they have guns, they should think again.
If a criminal wants a gun, all he has to do is find a legislator, and take his gun away from him. Does the legislator think that any citizen will intervene to protect him if some criminal is beating him after taking his gun away? Heck no. That criminal is in *control*, because he has a gun.
Great point yefragetuwrabrumuy.
Here’s another good one, the first comment after the article, by TexRancher:-
“Nothing new here: I would venture a guess that the percentage of criminals in California’s legislature is greater than that of the state’s general population. Having said that, it would follow that the legislature is exempting criminals (who don’t obey the law anyway) from the restrictions of the gun control law. That’s a misnomer anyway as laws don’t control OBJECTS, just people so these laws should be called people control laws!
On the national scene, the laws that Obama is working on “under the radar” are NOT GUN CONTROL LAWS BUT PEOPLE CONTROL LAWS! So much for his respect for the 2nd Amendment!”