Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: julieee
Nope, he didn't falter, but he headline to this and another thread is very misleading (intentionally).

Here is a response I posted elsewhere, and a Trump response during that interview.

Trump said, "Well, that's a pretty strange way of getting to pro-life. I mean, it's a very unique way of asking about pro-life. What does that have to do with privacy? How are you equating pro-life with privacy?"

Just how is that a stumble? Trump disagreed with the SCOTUS bogus and concocted justification for legalizing abortion. So what if he didn't immediately recognize that the "right to privacy" was the bogus excuse used by the court. He disagreed with it!

The constitution does imply and guarantee a right to privacy in several places (no unreasonable searches and seizures, religious freedom and others), but how many would stretch that to mean a right to kill a developing baby? Trump didn't.

8 posted on 04/19/2011 1:11:41 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Will88
The DEM media is starting its' hit on Trump. I expect a flurry of these....day after day....until he announces.

In the meantime, I'm sure Obama has hired a few "hit men" to go after Trump...Like a dozen IRS guys to begin with....

10 posted on 04/19/2011 1:30:53 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson