Skip to comments.
Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Biz Journals ^
| 04/13/2011
| Mike Sunnucks
Posted on 04/13/2011 12:39:01 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-226 next last
To: Tallguy
A presidential contender (with legal standing) needs to sue over the fact that the presidents father, BHO Sr, was not a US citizen at the time of his birth.
While you are probably correct as a legal matter, there is no way on God's green earth that a black president will be removed from the ballot on what the media will spin as a technicality based on differing definitions over "natural born". And Republicans (most of them, anyway) would pass whatever bill was necessary to make sure that such a "disagreement" would never affect his place on the upcoming ballot.
Don't get me wrong: this isn't about the legality of the situation, nor the constitutional arguments: just the politics. The media would line up an endless parade of academic constitutional lawyers swearing that "natural born" meant whatever Obama needs it to mean.
If this issue gets legs, it is the coverup that will bring him (and many in the media, the Republican party, and the entire Democratic establishment) down.
To: MrB
Is it just me, or does this prevent Obama from running in 2012 in Arizona based upon what he has thus far provided?
62
posted on
04/13/2011 1:12:57 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
To: MrB
And, there is no way to fit a non-existant LFBCs serial number between others born at the same timeFind someone of the right age who is dead and then substitute.
63
posted on
04/13/2011 1:13:29 PM PDT
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: kidd
If Obama sends his COLB with all its craziness on it, like father’s race African (yeah, in 1961? Riiiight), can someone protest that this is not acceptable?
64
posted on
04/13/2011 1:13:54 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: MrB
What the hell is an “EARLY CENSUS RECORD?”
I’d bet Oherpes has 99 of those under his pillow.
65
posted on
04/13/2011 1:14:23 PM PDT
by
LyinLibs
To: MrB
So Obama can use these two?
32(a) EARLY BAPTISMAL OR CIRCUMCISION CERTIFICATE.
33 (b) HOSPITAL BIRTH RECORD.
What is an early baptismal certificate? I read today that he was baptized sometime after he joined that trinity church.
To: MrB
Problem is HI just changed their law, only COLB will be made available, long BC is no longer available for anyone to get. If true issue will end up in court as two state laws conflict.
67
posted on
04/13/2011 1:16:11 PM PDT
by
Fee
To: Smokeyblue
Republicans are awful at marketing.
This should be called the “Anti-Birther” Bill. In order to shut the birthers up, AZ is requiring proof of citizenship.
Instead, it looks like an anti-Obama bill.
J
68
posted on
04/13/2011 1:16:13 PM PDT
by
CriticalJ
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
To: NeverEVERKerry
“An early baptismal or circumcision certificate.”???
What does that prove? He is not a mohammedan?
69
posted on
04/13/2011 1:16:36 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: RC2
hopefully the Okies will approve theirs as well.
70
posted on
04/13/2011 1:16:49 PM PDT
by
Vendome
("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
To: NeverEVERKerry
What about 37(e) BUBBLE GUM WRAPPER?
That’ll show the dirty commie.
71
posted on
04/13/2011 1:17:14 PM PDT
by
LyinLibs
To: LyinLibs
I think the first census for Barry was the one in 1970.
72
posted on
04/13/2011 1:17:32 PM PDT
by
Genoa
(Just show it)
To: Fee
Very well could be EXACTLY why they changed their law - they read HB2177.
73
posted on
04/13/2011 1:17:43 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: MrB
Hawaii can’t cover for the Malignant Moslem.
The jig is up.
74
posted on
04/13/2011 1:19:04 PM PDT
by
LyinLibs
To: Genoa; LyinLibs
All they had to do was lie to the census taker in 1970 and say he was born in the U.S.
75
posted on
04/13/2011 1:19:07 PM PDT
by
Genoa
(Just show it)
To: Oldexpat
“Why oppose such a measure?”
####
Two part answer:
a) Because thir diseased agenda relies on fraud, obfuscation and subterfuge.
b) Their allies in the Communist Media, not only refuse to point out tht simple fact, but actually are complicit in the criminality.
76
posted on
04/13/2011 1:19:16 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
(Gimme Shelter)
To: Smokeyblue
We need to get a bunch of other states to pass theirs - I think there @ 13 now considering it?
We need safety numbers - the thugs will go after one state - but if there's 10 or more, they’d have a really hard time to reverse it.
77
posted on
04/13/2011 1:19:20 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("We stand together or we fall apart" mt)
To: Mr. Wright; NCC-1701
I would think all the southern border states (exception - CA) would LOVE to participate in this...
To: maine-iac7
The new law should say “If a long-form BC EXISTS, then it must be submitted....”
Instead of “If the dirty moslem usurper POSSESSES a long-form BC.....”
Why? Because the filthy communist can just say “I don’t possess one.... it’s somewhere in a filing cabinet in some Hawaii statehouse building.”
79
posted on
04/13/2011 1:21:42 PM PDT
by
LyinLibs
To: Frantzie
Thankfully it looks like only about 19% of the populace (according to the latest poll) agrees. Unfortunately the media is a lost cause.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-226 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson