Skip to comments.
13-year-old ‘seduced’ pedophile, rules UK judge
LifeSiteNews ^
| 4/8/11
| Rebecca Millette
Posted on 04/11/2011 3:53:37 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: Alex Murphy; Cronos; wagglebee; trisham; Dr. Brian Kopp; BykrBayb; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; ...
There is a HUGE difference between disagreeing and attacking. You revel in downing others. Remember that your candle doesn't shine any brighter when you blow out someone elses.
Btw, I'm not a Catholic.
61
posted on
04/12/2011 7:55:46 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: DJ MacWoW
Btw, I'm not a Catholic. Nobody's perfect.
;-)
62
posted on
04/12/2011 8:00:59 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: Mad Dawg
63
posted on
04/12/2011 8:06:19 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: Mad Dawg; DJ MacWoW
64
posted on
04/12/2011 8:08:11 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Alex Murphy
You’re embarrassing yourself.
To: Charles Martel
Sex with under 12 is automatically rape in English, Scots, Welsh and NI law. As under 12’s are deemed not old enough to understand what sex is.
Sex with a 12-16 yr old if consenting is called ‘unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor’. A sensible charge imo.
Rape is of course rape.
To: Signalman
Under 12, yes.
12-16, if both parties consented, and one is over 16, its not rape, but ‘unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor’.
To: wagglebee
incompetent and insane come to mind as my thoughts of this “judge” I have more but will keep those to myself,,,
68
posted on
04/12/2011 8:18:01 AM PDT
by
rolling_stone
( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
To: Alex Murphy
In some RC’s sick Bizzaro world coddling pedophiles is seen as conservative behavior.
69
posted on
04/12/2011 8:41:25 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(I didn't reach the top of the food chain just to become a vegetarian.)
To: wagglebee
I’m sure that she did ‘seduce’ him, but he is the adult that should be responsible for his actions; children are what adults make them into.
To: tet68
Does that mean he should get off scot-free?
To: Trailerpark Badass
72
posted on
04/12/2011 9:03:13 AM PDT
by
Running On Empty
((The three sorriest words: "It's too late"))
To: Alex Murphy
Why? How about this: I may not care about the opinion of swine, but I stay out of their pens so their stank doesn’t overcame me.
To: Hegewisch Dupa
To: trisham
To: editor-surveyor
I couldn't agree more.
76
posted on
04/12/2011 9:36:40 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Alex Murphy; Cronos
That is a real knee-slapper.
I suppose it depends of what your definition of is is.
77
posted on
04/12/2011 10:36:04 AM PDT
by
the_conscience
(We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
To: wagglebee
What I meant is that the only reason the guy would go light on someone engaged in pedophilia is because he engages in it himself and identifies with the perps.
He is forced by the rule of law to do SOMETHING, so makes a feeble token attempt to enforcing the law because he has to. I don’t see that that it the fault of anyone but him.
78
posted on
04/12/2011 12:36:15 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
I agree.
I can understand why some judges are inclined to want to go easy on certain non-violent criminals under the idea that they can be reformed; however, this is NEVER the case with pedophiles.
79
posted on
04/12/2011 12:44:29 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Alex Murphy
The precedent this sets is huge for the Catholic Church, or at least for those Catholics on FR who argued that no priest molested anyone against their will, rather it was the priests who were themselves victims of seduction, taken advantage of by homosexuals within the age of consent. Excellent point.
Too bad making that excellent point brings calls for your damnation and other name-calling.
When they don't have any defense for their faith, they just try to push people around, hoping to shut them up (or burn them at the stake.)
80
posted on
04/12/2011 1:00:35 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson